CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 147Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchDigital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interapy: Treatment of Post-traumatic Stress via the Internet

Open access
Lange, Alfred, van de Ven, Jean-Pierre, Schrieken, Bart·2003·Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
DOI 10.1080/16506070302317
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper describes the theoretical background and procedures (including psycho-education, screening, treatment protocol and outcome measurement) involved in a protocol-driven internet treatment of post-traumatic stress and grief in a group of people who have suffered from mild to relatively severe trauma. The paper examines the results of 3 outcome and process studies, which were carried out initially in a student population and subsequently in the general population of highly traumatized people. In the latter study, participants in the experimental condition (n = 69) improved significantly more than participants in the waiting list control condition (n = 32), with respect to trauma-related symptoms and general psychopathology. The effect sizes were large. More than 50% of the participants treated showed reliable change and clinically significant improvement after treatment for avoidance and depression. Treatment proved most beneficial for participants who had suffered from intentional trauma and those who had not previously discussed the traumatic events with significant others. Content analysis of the publications indicates a remarkable increase in cognitive coping during treatment. The possibilities for future research into internet-driven treatment of post-traumatic stress symptomatology are discussed, including the proposal to study the effects of sending a final written letter to a significant other person.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16506070302317

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 56 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Hammer C., 2003, Lange termijn effect van de Interapy behandeling bij posttraumatische stress - Een follow-up onderzoek na ruim anderhalf jaar. (Long-term effects of the Interapy treatment)
  2. King L. A., 2002, The Writing Cure
  3. Kleber R. J., 1986, Traumatische ervaringen, gevolgen en verwerking (Traumatic events,consequences and processing)
  4. L'Abate L., 2002, The Writing Cure
  5. Lange A., 1994, Ericksonian Approaches, the Essence of the Story
  6. Lange A., 2002, The Writing Cure
  7. Lange A., 2000, Directieve Therapie, 20, 162
  8. Lemmen A., 2001, Inhoudsanalyse van cognitieve categorieen in gestructureerde schrijfopdrachten via Interapy (Content analysis of structured writing)
  9. Lepore, 2002, The Writing Cure
  10. Lutgendorf S. K., 2002, The Writing Cure
  11. 10.1002/jts.2490070305 · DOI
  12. Postmes T., 1997, Social Influences in Computer-Mediated Groups
  13. Schoutrop M., 2000, Structured writing in processing traumatic events
  14. Smyth J. M., 1999, Sharing One's Story; Translating Emotional Experiences Into Words as a Coping Tool

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–147 of 147

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lange, A., van de Ven, J.-P., & Schrieken, B.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
ORCID
Venue
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2003-01
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
110-124
ISSN
  • 1650-6073 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2316
DOI
10.1080/16506070302317
OpenAlex
W2134153769
Cited by
147
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nationaal Fonds Geestelijke Volksgezondheid
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, internet-delivered treatment, psychoeducation, trauma screening, grief, trauma symptoms, avoidance, depression, coping, treatment outcomes, process research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review