The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Internet-based Questionnaire Assessment: Appropriate Use in Clinical Contexts
Abstract
Use of internet-mediated questionnaire assessment is growing in behavioural telehealth provision. Literature on web-based psychological testing indicates that--while tests used online should be validated for online use--such measures can be reliable and valid. However, use of normative data (especially data from paper-and-pencil samples) presents problems. Studies have shown score distributions may differ across testing media, even when comparisons are made between equivalent samples. Data from 3 different projects illustrate such (substantive) differences, and the errors that would result from using established norms to interpret internet-mediated assessments. Given representativeness issues with "internet norms", it is recommended that if online tests are used for clinical purposes, this should currently be done in a manner that does not rely on normative data.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The online administration of assessments can yield psychometric properties equivalent to their paper-and-pencil counterparts.60”
In the citing paper
“Self-reported online questionnaires generally have the same psychometric properties as paper-and-pencil administrated questionnaires (Buchanan, 2003).”
From Internet-based treatment for vulvodynia (EMBLA) – Study protocol for a randomised controlled study (2021) · cites this paper as Buchanan, 2003
Citations
Cites
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x · Cited by 47,139
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
(1970) · Cited by 24,983
Self-monitoring of expressive behavior.
Snyder, M. (1974) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037039 · Cited by 3,525
(1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,151
Personality Psychology in Europe
Vera-Bermudez, J., Raad, D. B., de Vries, J., García, A. M. P., Sanchez-Elvita, A., & Heck, G. V. (1997) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 2,462
Measures in Health Psychology: A User's Portfolio
Johnston, M., Wright, S., & Weinman, J. A. (1995) · Cited by 1,300
Social desirability, anonymity, and internet-based questionnaires
Joinson, A. (1999) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03200723 · Cited by 818
Moorey, S., Greer, S., Watson, M., Gorman, C., Rowden, L., Tunmore, R., Robertson, B., & Bliss, J. M. (1991) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.158.2.255 · Cited by 653
World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutions
Schmidt, W. C. (1997) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03204826 · Cited by 620
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- 2001, The Psychologist, 14, 244
- 2000, APA Monitor on Psychology, 31, 13
- Snyder, 1987, Public Appearances/Private Realities
- Woolhouse, Myers. Factors Affecting Sample Make-up: Results from an Internet-based Personality Questionnaire. Paper presented at the 1999 British Psychological Society Social Psychology Section Conference. September,
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advantages and limitations of Internet-based interventions for common mental disorders
Andersson, G., & Titov, N. (2014) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20083 · Cited by 1,160
“An expanding literature concerned with how to collect patient data via the Internet has evolved (17), and it is timely to highlight the pros and cons of online data collection.”
BackgroundUsing the Internet to provide cognitive behaviour therapy
Andersson, G. (2009) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2009.01.010 · Cited by 560
“It is now fairly established that psychometric properties of self-report measures tend to transfer well when the same questionnaires are administered via the Internet, but that each instrument needs to be validated for online use (Buchanan, 2003).”
BackgroundWeb-based Questionnaires: The Future in Epidemiology?
van Gelder, M. M. H. J., Bretveld, R. W., & Roeleveld, N. (2010) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwq291 · Cited by 581
Internet Versus Mailed Questionnaires: A Randomized Comparison
Ritter, P., Lorig, K., Laurent, D., & Matthews, K. (2004) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6.3.e29 · Cited by 427
“And Buchanan (2003) [9] reported that even when Internet-based versions of instruments are reliable and valid, normative data from paper-and-pencil versions may not always compare directly with Internet-mediated psychological testing.”
BackgroundAndersson, G., Carlbring, P., Holmström, A., Sparthan, E., Furmark, T., Nilsson-Ihrfelt, E., Buhrman, M., & Ekselius, L. (2006) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.74.4.677 · Cited by 382
“As the validity of Internet-administered questionnaires is not yet clear, all outcome measures were administered on paper (cf. Andersson, Kaldo-Sandström, Ström, & Strömgren, 2003; Buchanan, 2003).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Buchanan, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Westminster (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Buchanan, Tom
- ORCID
- Buchanan, Tom
- Venue
- Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 100-109
- ISSN
- 1650-6073 (ISSN-L)
- 1651-2316
- OpenAlex
- W2065602829
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 28.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- reference values, test-retest reliability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review