Cited by 620Survey Methodology and NonresponseSurvey Sampling and Estimation TechniquesMobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing

World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutions

Open access
Schmidt, William C.·1997·Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03204826

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of self-reported and retrospective data could have introduced recall bias or social desirability bias, potentially impacting the accuracy of the responses.

    “Second, the use of self-reported and retrospective data could have introduced recall bias or social desirability bias, potentially impacting the accuracy of the responses [79].”

    From Knowledge and use, Perceptions of Benefits and Limitations of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots among Italian Physiotherapy students: a cross-sectional National Study (2025) · cites this paper as [79]

    The Unacceptable Responses section says respondents may provide incorrect information through entry error or intent, supporting a general concern about response accuracy. It does not identify retrospective self-report, recall bias, or social desirability bias as causes; the indexed passages provide no page number. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The survey design, composed of various question types (e.g., single- and multiple-choice), allowed for a more comprehensive exploration of the multifaceted nature of the phenomenon.

    “Furthermore, the survey design, composed of various question types (e.g., single- and multiple-choice), allowed for a more comprehensive exploration of the multifaceted nature of the phenomenon [79].”

    From Knowledge and use, Perceptions of Benefits and Limitations of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots among Italian Physiotherapy students: a cross-sectional National Study (2025) · cites this paper as [79]

    The paper discusses different Web-form response controls, including radio buttons and checkboxes (Not All Browsers Are Created Equally, page not provided), and describes presenting specialized sets of questions (Dynamic/Interactive Surveys Increase Respondent Motivation, p. 275). It does not say that combining single- and multiple-choice questions enabled a more comprehensive exploration of a multifaceted phenomenon. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Despite explicit instructions to provide truthful responses, some participants may have inaccurately reported their use of AI Chatbots, either intentionally or due to misunderstanding certain survey questions.

    “Lastly, despite explicit instructions to provide truthful responses, some participants may have inaccurately reported their use of AI Chatbots, either intentionally or due to misunderstanding certain survey questions [79].”

    From Knowledge and use, Perceptions of Benefits and Limitations of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots among Italian Physiotherapy students: a cross-sectional National Study (2025) · cites this paper as [79]

    The “Unacceptable Responses” section (page not provided) says survey respondents may supply incorrect information through entry error or intent. It does not address AI-chatbot use, truthful-response instructions, or misunderstanding survey questions specifically. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmidt, W. C.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Schmidt, William C.
Venue
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers
Published
1997-06
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
274-279
ISSN
  • 0743-3808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5970
OpenAlex
W2015477236
Cited by
620
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 43
FWCI
69.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
Keywords
online surveys, online survey data collection, survey software, missing data, duplicate submission, survey response quality, data entry errors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review