The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new look at the schema therapy model: organization and role of early maladaptive schemas
Abstract
Bo Bacha** http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5744-1769, George Lockwoodb & Jeffrey E. Youngca Center of Excellence on Personality Disorder, Psychiatric Research Unit, Region Zealand, Denmarkb Schema Therapy Institute Midwest, Kalamazoo Center, Kalamazoo, MI, USAc Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA* Corresponding author. Emails: bbpn@regionsjaelland.dk** bobachsayad@gmail.com Center of Excellence on Personality Disorder, Psychiatric Research Unit, Slagelse Psychiatric Hospital, Fælledvej 6, Bygning 3, 4200 Slagelse, DenmarkAbstractThis study reexamined the organization of Young’s 18 early maladaptive schemas and their hypothesized associations with experiences of need-thwarting parental experiences in childhood and the “vulnerable child” mode of emotional distress in adulthood. A large Danish sample (N = 1054) of 658 clinical- and 391 nonclinical adults completed measures of early maladaptive schemas, parenting styles, and the vulnerable child mode. We identified four higher-order schema domains as most appropriate in terms of interpretability and empirical indices (“Disconnection & Rejection”, “Impaired Autonomy & Performance”, “Excessive Responsibility & Standards”, and “Impaired Limits”). All four schema domains were differentially associated with conceptually relevant need-thwarting parental experiences. Apart from “Impaired Limits”, the schema domains meaningfully accounted for the association between need-thwarting parental experiences in childhood and emotional states of feeling like a “vulnerable child” in adulthood. We conclude that four domains of early maladaptive schemas are empirically and conceptually consistent with Young’s schema therapy model of personality pathology and longstanding emotional disorders. Findings warrant replication using different populations and if possible a prospective multi-method design. A scoring key for computing the four schema domains is provided.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Because these underlying structures are recognized as contributing to psychological suffering, many therapeutic approaches target them to foster long-term change [10-13].”
From Schema-Informed Digital Mental Health Intervention for Maladaptive Cognitive-Emotional Patterns: Randomized Controlled Trial (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Schema-linked difficulties, such as perfectionism, rejection sensitivity, social withdrawal, and anxious overcontrol, are well-known contributors to long-term distress and functional impairment if left unaddressed [10].”
From Schema-Informed Digital Mental Health Intervention for Maladaptive Cognitive-Emotional Patterns: Randomized Controlled Trial (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis :
Hayes, A. F., & names (2015) · Cited by 7,004
Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation
Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.12.1.23 · Cited by 3,401
Bowlby (1977) · doi:10.1192/bjp.130.3.201 · Cited by 2,844
Schema Therapy: A Practitioner’s Guide
TEMPLE, S. D. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.11.2074-a · Cited by 1,211
How Should the Internal Structure of Personality Inventories Be Evaluated?
Hopwood, C. J., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868310361240 · Cited by 671
[Turkish Journal of Psychiatry].
Uluşahin, A. (2009) · PubMed · Cited by 611
Schmidt, N. B., Joiner, T. E., Young, J. E., & Telch, M. J. (1995) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/bf02230402 · Cited by 543
Self-citationDoing it all Bass-Ackwards: The development of hierarchical factor structures from the top down
Goldberg, L. R. (2006) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.01.001 · Cited by 409
Scott, K. M., McLaughlin, K. A., Smith, D. A. R., & Ellis, P. M. (2012) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.111.103267 · Cited by 317
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 10.1002/9781119962830 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542.Mediation · DOI
- Saritas D., 2011, Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Psychotherapies, 11, 83
- 10.1111/papt.2011.84.issue-4 · DOI
- Young J. E., 2003, Young parenting inventory
- Young J. E., 2005, Young schema questionnaire – Short form 3 (YSQ-S3)
- Young J. E., 2014, Early maladaptive schemas – Revised
- Young J. E., 2003, Schema mode listing
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pilkington, P. D., Bishop, A., & Younan, R. (2021) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2533 · Cited by 204
Early maladaptive schemas and depression in adulthood: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Bishop, A., Younan, R., Low, J., & Pilkington, P. D. (2021) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2630 · Cited by 157
Schema therapy conceptualization of personality functioning and traits in ICD-11 and DSM-5
Bach, B., & Bernstein, D. P. (2018) · Current Opinion in Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/yco.0000000000000464 · Cited by 100
Self-citationMay, T., Younan, R., & Pilkington, P. D. (2022) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2712 · Cited by 74
“Schema domains have recently been reorganized (Bach et al., 2018; Yalcin et al., 2020) into four domains based on factor analyses.”
InfluentialBruysters, N. Y. F., & Pilkington, P. D. (2022) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2776 · Cited by 53
“Based on the unmet core emotional needs, Young et al. (2006) identified 18 schemas organized into four domains (Bach et al., 2018) summarized below (see appendix A of Bach et al., 2018, for full list of schemas and definitions).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Bach, B., Lockwood, G., & Young, J. E.
- Affiliations
- Region Zealand (DK)
- Schema Therapy Institute Midwest, Kalamazoo Center, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bach, Bo
- ORCID
- Bach, Bo
- Venue
- Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-12-19
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 328-349
- ISSN
- 1650-6073 (ISSN-L)
- 1651-2316
- OpenAlex
- W2779355268
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8
- FWCI
- 11.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- schema therapy, early maladaptive schemas, parental experiences, personality pathology, emotional distress, disconnection and rejection, impaired limits
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Denmark, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Personality Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Case-Control Studies, Parenting, Personal Autonomy, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review