Cited by 410Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

Doing it all Bass-Ackwards: The development of hierarchical factor structures from the top down

Goldberg, Lewis R.·2006·Journal of Research in Personality

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.01.001

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldberg, L. R.
Affiliations
Oregon Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Goldberg, Lewis R.
Venue
Journal of Research in Personality
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-08
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
347-358
ISSN
0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065985521
Cited by
409
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
hierarchical factor structure, factor scores, path coefficients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review