Cited by 24HIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Feasibility and acceptability of a bar-based sexual risk reduction intervention for bar patrons in Tshwane, South Africa

Open access
Morojele, Neo K., Kitleli, Naledi, Ngako, Kgalabi, Kekwaletswe, Connie T., Nkosi, Sebenzile, Fritz, Katherine, Parry, Charles D.H.·2014·SAHARA-J: Journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS

Abstract

Alcohol consumption is a recognised risk factor for HIV infection. Alcohol serving establishments have been identified as appropriate venues in which to deliver HIV prevention interventions. This paper describes experiences and lessons learnt from implementing a combined HIV prevention intervention in bar settings in one city- and one township-based bar in Tshwane, South Africa. The intervention consisted of peer-led and brief intervention counselling sub-components. Thirty-nine bar patrons were recruited and trained, and delivered HIV and alcohol risk reduction activities to their peers as peer interventionists. At the same time, nine counsellors received training and visited the bars weekly to provide brief motivational interviewing counselling, advice, and referrals to the patrons of the bars. A responsible server sub-component that had also been planned was not delivered as it was not feasible to train the staff in the two participating bars. Over the eight-month period the counsellors were approached by and provided advice and counselling for alcohol and sexual risk-related problems to 111 bar patrons. The peer interventionists reported 1323 risk reduction interactions with their fellow bar patrons during the same period. The intervention was overall well received and suggests that bar patrons and servers can accept a myriad of intervention activities to reduce sexual risk behaviour within their drinking settings. However, HIV- and AIDS-related stigma hindered participation in certain intervention activities in some instances. The buy-in that we received from the relevant stakeholders (i.e. bar owners/managers and patrons, and the community at large) was an important contributor to the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17290376.2014.890123

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sample sizes ranged from nine to 54,187.

    “The sample sizes ranged from nine, in a study exploring the effectiveness of training lay providers to deliver a BI [42], to 54,187 in a cross-sectional study exploring the feasibility of implementing BI in a health facility and community setting [43].”

    From A scoping review of substance use brief interventions in Africa (2024) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Methods section (Counsellor intervention; page unavailable) says nine counsellors were recruited and trained in brief intervention. But nine is the number of counsellors, not the overall study sample, and the Introduction says intervention outcomes were not assessed. The paper therefore does not support describing this as a study of the effectiveness of training lay providers. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sample sizes ranged from 9 to 946.

    “Sample sizes ranged from 9 [42] to 946 [111] (for all studies and not by study design).”

    From A scoping review of substance use brief interventions in Africa (2024) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Results (‘Sisonke Mentor’ intervention; page not available) report nine trained mentors at the township bar, but 39 recruited across both bars. Thus, nine is a site-specific subgroup, not this study’s overall sample size. The citation [42] is attached to nine; the figure 946 is attributed to a different source and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In all studies, participants reported that the training was useful and improved their capacity to offer SBI.

    “In all studies, the participants reported that the training was useful and improved their capacity to offer SBI [41,42,110].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Fritz K. Lawrence X. 2009 Systematic Literature Review: Bar-Based Health Promotion/Harm Reduction Interventions, 1991–2009. Unpublished Report
  2. Morojele N. K. Kachieng'a M. A. Nkoko M. A. Moshia K. M. Mokoko E. Parry C. D. H. et al. 2004 Perceived Effects of Alcohol use on Sexual Encounters among Adults in South Africa African Journal of Drug and Alcohol Studies 3 1 & 2 1 20

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morojele, N. K., Kitleli, N., Ngako, K., Kekwaletswe, C. T., Nkosi, S., Fritz, K., & Parry, C. D. H.
Affiliations
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • International Center for Research on Women (US)
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
Corresponding author
Morojele, Neo K.
Venue
SAHARA-J: Journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS
Published
2014-01-02
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
1-9
ISSN
  • 1729-0376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1813-4424
OpenAlex
W2109829919
Cited by
24
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • SAHARA-J Journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U2GPS001137)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
HIV prevention, sexual risk reduction, bar patrons, alcohol consumption, peer-led intervention, intervention feasibility, acceptability, HIV stigma, Tshwane
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Counseling, Female, Humans, Male, Peer Group, Risk Factors, South Africa, HIV Infections, Risk Reduction Behavior, Unsafe Sex, Young Adult, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review