Cited by 124Stress and Burnout ResearchEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessStudent Stress and Coping

School burnout and engagement profiles among digital natives in Finland: a person-oriented approach

Salmela-Aro, Katariina, Muotka, Joona, Alho, Kimmo, Hakkarainen, Kai, Lonka, Kirsti·2016·European Journal of Developmental Psychology

Abstract

Applying a person-oriented approach, this study set out to examine what profiles of school engagement and school burnout (i.e., exhaustion, cynicism, inadequacy) can be identified among elementary school children at age 12, a generation also often referred to as the generation of digital natives. We compared the group memberships in their use of socio-digital technologies and related functioning as we expected to find a gap between some digital natives and current educational practices which do not include socio-digital technology in feelings of cynicism towards school. Latent profile analysis identified five groups: Engaged (50%) students, who formed the majority; Stressed (4%) students, who reported high exhaustion and high inadequacy as a student; Students High in cynicism (burnout group) (5%) with high scores on all the components of school burnout, particularly cynicism, but also on exhaustion and inadequacy as a student; students Moderate in Cynicism (15%), whose cynicism was directed in particular towards studying and school; and, finally, students Emerging Cynicism (bored group) (26%), whose feelings of cynicism were nevertheless elevated. These results thus revealed that almost half (46%) of the elementary students felt some degree of cynicism towards school, thereby supporting our gap hypothesis: these groups of cynical students reported that they would be more engaged at school if socio-digital technologies were used at school. These results indicate that one way t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17405629.2015.1107542

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salmela-Aro, K., Muotka, J., Alho, K., Hakkarainen, K., & Lonka, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Jyväskylä (FI)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
European Journal of Developmental Psychology
Published
2016-11
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
704-718
ISSN
  • 1740-5610 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-5629
OpenAlex
W2546572056
Cited by
124
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6
FWCI
13.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Academy of Finland (273872, 1265528)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
academic burnout, school engagement, digital natives, cynicism, exhaustion, inadequacy, elementary school students, student profile, educational technology, Finland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review