Cited by 235Inclusion and Disability in Education and SportPhysical Education and PedagogySociology, History and Politics of Sport

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Still feeling like a spare piece of luggage? Embodied experiences of (dis)ability in physical education and school sport

Fitzgerald, Hayley·2005·Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy

Abstract

This paper addresses an increasing concern within physical education and sports research to engage with young people to find out more about their experiences of physical education and school sport. In particular, I centre my concerns on the experiences of five young disabled pupils. I use the conceptual tools offered by Bourdieu to extend understandings of disability beyond those typically associated with medical and social model perceptives and in so doing explore the notion of the embodied identities of the disabled pupils in this study. In this paper, I also develop Evans' (2004 Evans, J. (2004). Making a difference? Education and ‘ability’ in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 10(1): 95–108. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]) recent discussion focusing on ‘ability’ and particularly his concern for ability to be conceptualised as a sociocultural and dynamic entity. The data generated reveals that a paradigm of normativity prevails in physical education. It would seem the physical education habitus serves to affirm a normative presence in physical education and school sport and is manifest through conceptions of ability that recognise and value a mesomorphic ideal, masculinity and high levels of motoric competence. I conclude by suggesting that articulations of ability need to be recast and understood in ways that extend beyond narrowly defined measures of performance and normative conceptions of what is it to have a sporting body.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1740898042000334908

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 0 references

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. 10.1080/0968759032000127353 · DOI
  2. Barnes C, 1999, Exploring disability: a sociological introduction
  3. Barton L, 1993, Equality, education and physical education
  4. Borrett N, 1995, Disability, young people and school sport
  5. Bourdieu P, 1991, Rethinking popular culture: contemporary perspectives in cultural studies
  6. Bourdieu P, 1992, The login of practice
  7. Bourdieu P, 1993, Sociology in question
  8. Bourdieu P, 2002, An invitation to reflexive sociology
  9. 10.1080/1357332032000050060 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/1357332042000175827 · DOI
  11. Christensen P, 2000, Research with children: perspectives and practices
  12. Christensen P, 2002, Childhood, 477–497, 9
  13. Connell RW, 1995, Masculinities
  14. Crossley N, 2001, The social body
  15. 10.1080/09687590120070060 · DOI
  16. Davis J, 2002, Embodying disability theory
  17. 2003, Data collection by type of special educational need
  18. DePauw KP, 1997, Quest, 416–430, 49
  19. DePauw KP, 2000, Quest, 52, 358, 10.1080/00336297.2000.10491723 · DOI
  20. 2002, Survey of young disabled people aged 16–24
  21. 10.1177/0038038503037002002 · DOI
  22. Evans J, 1990, Physical education, curriculum and culture: critical issues in the contemporary crisis
  23. 10.1177/1356336X04042158 · DOI
  24. Finkelstein V, 1980, Attitudes and disabled people
  25. 10.1111/1467-9604.00294 · DOI
  26. Fitzgerald H, 2003, European Journal of Physical Education, 8, 175, 10.1080/1740898030080206 · DOI
  27. Gillborn D, 2001, Sociology of education today
  28. Glaser BG, 1967, The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research
  29. Goffman E, 1968, Stigma
  30. Grey-Thompson T, 2001, Tannie Grey-Thompson: seize the day
  31. Groves S, 2000, European Journal of Physical Education, 5, 19, 10.1080/174089800050102 · DOI
  32. Hevey D, 1992, The creatures that time forgot: photography and disability imagery
  33. 10.1080/1357332990040104 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/09687599727209 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/09687590050058170 · DOI
  36. Hodge SR, 2003, Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 20, 381, 10.1123/apaq.20.4.381 · DOI
  37. Jackson L, 2002, Freaks, geeks and Asperger Syndrome. A user guide to adolescence
  38. Jenkins R, 2002, Pierre Bourdieu
  39. Jones R, 2001, European Journal of Physical Education, 6, 81, 10.1080/1740898010060202 · DOI
  40. 10.1080/0159630980190107 · DOI
  41. LaMaster KH, 1998, Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 15, 64, 10.1123/apaq.15.1.64 · DOI
  42. 10.1080/713696032 · DOI
  43. Lincoln YS, 1985, Naturalistic inquiry, 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1080/09687599925975 · DOI
  45. Meekosha H, 1999, The disability reader
  46. Miles MB, 1994, Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook
  47. Morris J, 1991, Pride against prejudice
  48. Oliver M, 1996, Understanding disability: from theory to practice, 10.1007/978-1-349-24269-6 · DOI
  49. 10.1080/13573320120084245 · DOI
  50. Patterson K, 2000, The body, culture and society
  51. Penney D, 2002, The sociology of sport and physical education an introductory reader
  52. Penney D, 1995, British Journal of Physical Education, 6
  53. 10.1080/135733200114442 · DOI
  54. 10.1111/1467-9566.ep10932129 · DOI
  55. Priestley M, 1999, Disability discourse
  56. Priestley M, 1999, Disability Studies Quarterly, 19, 90
  57. Schmidt RA, 1991, Motor learning and performance: from principles to practice
  58. Siedentop D, 2002, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21, 392, 10.1123/jtpe.21.4.392 · DOI
  59. Shelley P, 2002, Everybody here? Play and leisure for disabled children and young people
  60. Shilling C, 1996, The body and social theory
  61. 10.1080/1740898042000208115 · DOI
  62. 2001, Disability survey 2000. Young people with a disability and sport, headline findings
  63. Stone E, 2001, Sociology of Sport Journal, 18, 51, 10.1123/ssj.18.1.51 · DOI
  64. Swain J, 1999, Disability discourse
  65. Talbot M, 1997, Sport and leisure: connections and controversies
  66. Tinning R, 1990, Ideology and physical education
  67. 10.1080/1357332022000018814 · DOI
  68. 10.1080/09687590220140377 · DOI
  69. Vickerman P, 2002, The Bulletin of Physical Education, 38, 79
  70. Viscardi H, 2001, Me Too! A report by Mencap on play, leisure and childcare for children and young people with a disability in the metropolitan borough of Dudley
  71. Xiang P, 2001, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 20, 282, 10.1123/jtpe.20.3.282 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fitzgerald, H.
Corresponding author
Fitzgerald, Hayley
Venue
Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy
Published
2005-02
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
41-59
ISSN
  • 1362-7120 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-8989
  • 1742-5786
OpenAlex
W2140487076
Cited by
235
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
  • Social Sciences › Education › Physical Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sociology, History and Politics of Sport
Keywords
disability, embodied identity, physical education, school sports, Pierre Bourdieu, habitus, normativity, ability, masculinity, motor competence, sports organizations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review