Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 217

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Targeted metabolomics reveals differential biological effects of nanoplastics and nanoZnO in human lung cells

Lim, Swee Ling, Ng, Cheng Teng, Zou, Li, Lu, Yonghai, Chen, Jiaqing, Bay, Boon Huat, Shen, Han-Ming, Ong, Choon Nam·2019·Nanotoxicology

Abstract

Engineered nanomaterials are of public health concern. Recently, there has been an increasing attention on the toxicity of nanoplastics and nanoZnO because of their increasing utilization and presence in the environment. However, knowledge of their toxicological behavior and metabolic interactions with the cellular machinery that determine their potential health effects are extremely limited. In this study, the cellular uptake, cytotoxic effects, and metabolic responses of bronchus epithelial (BEAS-2B) cells exposed to nanopolystyrene (nanoPS) and a widely used metallic nanoparticle, nanoZnO, were investigated using a tandem mass spectrometry-based metabolomics approach. The results revealed that even with low cytotoxicity, these nanoparticles (NPs) affected cell metabolism. NanoPS exposure showed autophagic- and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-related metabolic changes such as increased in amino acids and tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) intermediate metabolites, a process known to play a critical role in regulating cell resistance to cytotoxic effects. Both metabolomics profiling and ER-stress pathway, together with quantitative real-time RT-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analyses, demonstrated that autophagy was reciprocally regulated to couple metabolic and transcriptional reprograming. In contrast, nanoZnO-induced ROS-mediated cell death was associated with mitochondrial dysfunction and interference in regulating energy metabolism. Collectively, these two types of NPs were observed to cause perturbations albeit differential in cellular metabolism associated with their cytotoxic effects. Our findings provided an in depth understanding of metabolic changes influenced by two different types of NPs, with contrasting molecular mechanisms for the adverse effects observed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17435390.2019.1640913

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 217

Metadata

Authors
Lim, S. L., Ng, C. T., Zou, L., Lu, Y., Chen, J., Bay, B. H., Shen, H.-M., & Ong, C. N.
Venue
Nanotoxicology
Published
2019-07-24
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
1117-1132
ISSN
  • 1743-5390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-5404
OpenAlex
W2954207903
Cited by
217
References
4
FWCI
5.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Targeted metabolomics reveals differential biological effects of nanoplastics and nanoZnO in human lung cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17435390.2019.1640913
The paper
Lim, S. L., Ng, C. T., Zou, L., Lu, Y., Chen, J., Bay, B. H., Shen, H.-M., & Ong, C. N. (2019). Targeted metabolomics reveals differential biological effects of nanoplastics and nanoZnO in human lung cells. Nanotoxicology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2019.1640913

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.