The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does planning how to cope with anticipated barriers facilitate health-related behaviour change? A systematic review
Abstract
Health-related interventions often prompt participants to plan how to cope with anticipated barriers to behaviour change, a technique known as coping planning. The purpose of this study was to review the evidence of the efficacy of prompting individuals to form coping plans as a technique for promoting health-related behaviour change. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase and PsycInfo) and unpublished literature were searched for randomised controlled trials that allocated participants to the study conditions with and without prompts to form coping plans. Evidence was assessed for quality and narratively synthesised. Full text papers of 65 articles were assessed for eligibility and 11 papers were included in the review. Coping planning interventions appear to be efficacious when participants are supported in the process of forming coping plans. Combining action plans with coping plans seems to be more efficacious than using action plans only. The overall efficacy of coping planning is variable. Future interventions should consider potential moderators of the efficacy of such plans.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For primary hypothesis H1, to detect increases in uptake from 50% to 65% (a conservative baseline based on previous research [53]), with conservative increase based on previous work by Ebert et al. [16] with 90% power requires a sample of 231 per condition (with α = .05).”
In the citing paper
“To detect increases in adherence (H2), assuming a small effect of f = 0.19 (the estimated median effect from previous research [53]) between active conditions requires a sample of 111 per condition.”
Citations
Cites
Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.493 · Cited by 5,478
Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38002-1 · Cited by 3,236 · cited 3×
“…intentions’ (Prestwich, Ayres, & Lawton, 2008), ‘shielding goal striving from unwanted thoughts and feelings’ (Achtziger, Gollwitzer, & Sheeran, 2008), ‘shielding goals from unwanted responses’ (Gollwitzer & Sheeran, 2006) or descriptively ‘planning how to overcome behaviour change barriers’.”
BackgroundInfluentialSniehotta, F. F., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870440512331317670 · Cited by 1,350
Self-citationAction planning and coping planning for long-term lifestyle change: theory and assessment
Sniehotta, F. F., Schwarzer, R., Scholz, U., & Schüz, B. (2005) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.258 · Cited by 1,031
Self-citationGriffiths, F., Lindenmeyer, A., Powell, J., Lowe, P., & Thorogood, M. (2006) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.8.2.e10 · Cited by 820
Implementation Intentions and the Theory of Planned Behavior
Orbell, S., Hodgkins, S., & Sheeran, P. (1997) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167297239004 · Cited by 658
Sniehotta, F. F., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2006) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1348/135910705x43804 · Cited by 541
Self-citationTheories and techniques of behaviour change: Developing a cumulative science of behaviour change
Michie, S., & Johnston, M. (2012) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2012.654964 · Cited by 522
Good intentions, bad habits, and effects of forming implementation intentions on healthy eating
Verplanken, B., & Faes, S. (1999) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6 · Cited by 509
‘Inclined abstainers’: A problem for predicting health‐related behaviour
Orbell, S., & Sheeran, P. (1998) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1998.tb01162.x · Cited by 506
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Higgins,J. P. T. , & Green,S. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systemetic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Retrieved from www.cochrane-handbook.org
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kwasnicka, D., Dombrowski, S. U., White, M., & Sniehotta, F. (2016) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2016.1151372 · Cited by 1,476
Self-citationThe Handbook of Behavior Change
Hagger, M. S., Cameron, L. D., Hamilton, K., Hankonen, N. E., & Lintunen, T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318 · Cited by 446
Changing Behavior Using the Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.002 · Cited by 346
An Integrated Approach for Understanding Health Behavior; The I-Change Model as an Example
de Vries, H. (2017) · Psychology and Behavioral Science International Journal · doi:10.19080/pbsij.2017.02.555585 · Cited by 270
Schwarzer, R. (2016) · Actualidades en Psicología · doi:10.15517/ap.v30i121.23458 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwasnicka, D., Presseau, J., White, M., & Sniehotta, F. F.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University
- United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Sniehotta, Falko F.
- Venue
- Health Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-02-19
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-145
- ISSN
- 1743-7199 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-7202
- OpenAlex
- W1999436456
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 2.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Health Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council (MR/K02325X/1)
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007470/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Keywords
- coping planning, health behavior change, action plan, behaviour change interventions, intervention efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
