Cited by 522Behavioral Health and InterventionsBehavioral and Psychological StudiesHealth Policy Implementation Science

Theories and techniques of behaviour change: Developing a cumulative science of behaviour change

Open access
Michie, Susan, Johnston, Marie·2012·Health Psychology Review

Abstract

As behaviour contributes to the cause of much current mortality and morbidity (Mokdad, Marks, Stroup, & Gerberding, 2000; Parkin, Boyd, & Walker, 2011), interventions to change behaviour are essent...

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This editorial argues that the science of behaviour change will only accumulate if researchers define behaviour itself as the intervention outcome, describe interventions in terms of replicable behaviour change techniques (BCTs), and connect those techniques to theoretical mechanisms of change. It reviews evidence from companion meta-analyses showing that theory-based interventions outperform merely technique-rich ones.

Key findings

  • The authors identify three priorities: clarifying "behaviour" as the outcome, developing replicable reporting of BCTs, and linking interventions and BCTs to theoretical mechanisms.
  • Behaviour is often mislabelled (e.g., "adherence," "physical activity") or confused with downstream outcomes such as weight or blood glucose; the apparent effectiveness of an intervention depends on which outcome type is chosen.
  • In the cited meta-analyses, the sheer number of BCTs did not predict efficacy, but having an explicit theoretical basis did; Dombrowski et al. found interventions containing more BCTs congruent with Control Theory produced greater weight loss in obese adults, and Taylor et al. found the degree to which worksite physical activity interventions were theory-based predicted effectiveness.
  • Taylor et al.'s meta-analysis also found smaller intervention effects when BCTs were not specified, and Dombrowski et al. identified instruction, self-monitoring and practice as effective techniques.

Methods

  • Design: an editorial/commentary synthesising conceptual arguments and citing findings from the themed issue of *Health Psychology Review* and related literature; no primary data collection.
  • Evidence base: secondary — meta-analyses and meta-regressions by Dombrowski et al. (2012), Taylor et al. (2012), Webb et al. (2010), Michie, Abraham et al. (2009), plus taxonomy-development work on physical activity/healthy eating, smoking, alcohol and condom use.
  • Analysis: narrative argument organised around the three proposed advances; no statistical analysis performed by the authors.

Limitations

  • Not stated in the paper: the editorial does not present a limitations section.
  • Evident from the text: the argument rests entirely on secondary sources and illustrative examples rather than new empirical evidence, so the claims about theory–technique links are programmatic rather than tested.
  • Evident from the text: the authors note that BCT taxonomies have been built inductively and their hierarchical structures have not yet been investigated, and that the mapping of BCTs to theoretical constructs remains a preliminary attempt requiring further work.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17437199.2012.654964

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 22 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation
    § Behaviour is the outcome of behaviour change interventions

    The Theory of Planned Behaviour may predict some behaviours better than others.

    “McEachan, Conner, Taylor and Lawton's (2011) finding that the Theory of Planned Behaviour may be more effective in predicting some behaviours than others.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McEachan, Conner, Taylor and Lawton's (2011) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationcitation
    § Behaviour is the outcome of behaviour change interventions

    Using outcomes further down the causal chain to judge intervention effectiveness is problematic because many factors can weaken the link between behaviour and outcome.

    “The problem with evaluating intervention effectiveness in terms of outcomes further down the causal chain (Hardeman et al., 2005) is that there are a host of influences that could intervene and attenuate the link between behaviour and outcome.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hardeman et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation
    § Behaviour is the outcome of behaviour change interventions

    In some interventions, behaviour itself is the health outcome of value, such as when reducing activity limitations or increasing participation.

    “For some interventions, behaviour per se is the valued health outcome, for example, in studies to reduce activity limitations or enhance participation (Johnston, Bonetti, & Pollard, 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Johnston, Bonetti, & Pollard, 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationreasoning
    § Behaviour change techniques

    Specification also makes systematic classification possible.

    “Specification also enables a further step underpinning scientific investigation, systematic classification.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisenone given
    § Behaviour change techniques

    Scientific standards that are required and successful for biomedical interventions are often disregarded when the intervention is behavioural.

    “The scientific standards demanded, and found to be successful, for biomedical interventions are often ignored when the intervention involves behaviour change.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 1
  • May combine two claims. 9
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § EDITORIAL Theories and techniques of behaviour change: Developing a cumulative science of behaviour change

    Behaviour contributes to a large share of current mortality and morbidity.

    “As behaviour contributes to the cause of much current mortality and morbidity (Mokdad, Marks, Stroup, & Gerberding, 2000;Parkin, Boyd, & Walker, 2011)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Mokdad, Marks, Stroup, & Gerberding, 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Parkin, Boyd, & Walker, 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Behaviour change techniques

    Behaviour change interventions are often poorly specified, which prevents high-fidelity replication, and are delivered by people whose competence is not reported.

    “whilst behaviour change interventions are often poorly specified, preventing high-fidelity replication and, despite being complex, delivered by individuals of unreported competence.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Behaviour change techniques

    Specifying behaviour change techniques precisely may improve interventions; meta-analysis found smaller effects when techniques were not specified.

    “Precise specification of BCTs may also enhance the intervention: Taylor et al.'s (2012) meta-analysis found that when BCTs were not specified, intervention effects were smaller.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Taylor et al.'s (2012)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Linking BCTs with theoretical mechanisms of change

    Important frameworks for intervention design and evaluation stress that theory should inform design and that interventions should be specified by component techniques.

    “Key frameworks for designing and evaluating behaviour change interventions (Collins et al., 2011;Craig et al., 2008) emphasise the importance of using theory to inform intervention design as well as specifying interventions in terms of component BCTs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Collins et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Craig et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Linking BCTs with theoretical mechanisms of change

    Whether an intervention had a theoretical basis predicted efficacy, whereas the count of techniques used did not.

    “Both Dombrowski et al. (2012) and Taylor et al. (2012) found that the number of BCTs used did not predict efficacy but having a theoretical basis for the intervention did.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dombrowski et al. (2012) source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Taylor et al. (2012)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Linking BCTs with theoretical mechanisms of change

    Interventions with more techniques congruent with Control Theory were linked to greater weight loss in obese adults, repeating a finding in the general adult population.

    “interventions including more BCTs that were congruent with Control Theory (Carver & Scheier, 1982) were associated with greater weight loss (in this case, a proxy for healthy eating) in obese adult patients, replicating a similar finding by Michie, Abraham, et al. (2009) in the general adult population.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Carver & Scheier, 1982 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Michie, Abraham, et al. (2009)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Behaviour is the outcome of behaviour change interventions

    Behaviour can involve a complex sequence of actions over time; medication adherence requires at least four behaviours.

    “Behaviour may involve the performance of a complex sequence of actions over time; for example, Di Matteo and colleagues identify a sequence of at least four behaviours necessary to adhere to medication advice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Di Matteo and colleagues

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Linking BCTs with theoretical mechanisms of change

    The degree to which worksite physical activity interventions were explicitly theory-based predicted their effectiveness, matching findings for internet interventions.

    “Taylor et al. also found that the extent to which worksite physical activity interventions were explicitly based on theory (using Michie & Prestwich's (2010) theory coding scheme) predicted their effectiveness, a finding consistent with a similar analysis of internet interventions (Webb, Joseph, Yardley, & Michie, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Michie & Prestwich's (2010) source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Webb, Joseph, Yardley, & Michie, 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Behaviour change techniques

    With a reliable BCT coding scheme, instruction, self-monitoring and practice were found to be effective techniques.

    “For example, using a reliable BCT coding scheme, Dombrowski et al. (2012) found that instruction, self-monitoring and practice were effective techniques.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dombrowski et al. (2012) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Linking BCTs with theoretical mechanisms of change

    Linking theoretical mechanisms to behaviour change techniques is needed both to inform intervention development and to test theory through intervention evaluation.

    “This link is necessary both to theoretically inform intervention development and to test theory by evaluating interventions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
10 of 10
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The effectiveness of behaviour change interventions varies, and the reasons for this variation are not fully understood.

    “However, their effectiveness is variable, and we do not have a full understanding of what accounts for this variability.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Ineffective techniques are still used, effective techniques are underused, hard to replicate, and their mechanisms are poorly understood.

    “Ineffective techniques continue to be used, while effective techniques are underused, difficult to replicate and their mechanisms of action are poorly understood.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Basic psychological research over the past century has shown that behaviour and behaviour change follow predictable patterns.

    “Basic psychological research over the last century has demonstrated that behaviour and behaviour change follow predictable patterns.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The hierarchical structures of behaviour-specific BCT classifications have not yet been studied.

    “To date, their hierarchical structures have not been investigated.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Abraham C., 2011, Psychology & Health, 26, 299
  2. Hobbs L., 2011, Psychology & Health, 26, 31
  3. Johnston M., 2002, Psychology at the turn of the millennium, Vol. 1: Cognitive, Biological and Health Perspectives, 319
  4. Marteau T.M., 1987, Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 40, 82
  5. Michie S., Encyclopaedia of Behavioral Medicine
  6. Michie S., Addiction

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michie, S., & Johnston, M.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Michie, Susan
Venue
Health Psychology Review
Published
2012-03
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 1743-7199 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-7202
OpenAlex
W1969321932
Cited by
522
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 9
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
behavior change, behaviour change interventions, cumulative science, health behavior, health promotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review