Cited by 78Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsBusiness Strategies and Management ResearchAppreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change

Grounded theory

Corbin, Juliet·2017·The Journal of Positive Psychology

Abstract

"Grounded theory." The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), pp. 301–302

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262614

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corbin, J.
Affiliations
San Jose State University (US)
Corresponding author
Corbin, Juliet
Venue
The Journal of Positive Psychology
Published
2017-01-31
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
301-302
ISSN
  • 1743-9760 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9779
OpenAlex
W4237074748
Cited by
78
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Positive Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change
Keywords
grounded theory, qualitative research methodology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review