Cited by 29Online Learning and AnalyticsDigital Education and SocietyEducational Technology in Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The quantified self for learning: critical questions for education

Open access
Eynon, Rebecca·2015·Learning, Media and Technology

Abstract

While the quantified self-community remains a relatively niche group, using technology to record and track information about at least one part of our lives is becoming more commonplace. Particularl...

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17439884.2015.1100797

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More recently, some libraries have built learning analytics capacity to analyze student behaviors in library information systems, often to attest to a library's value with respect to student learning outcomes.

    “More recently, some libraries have built LA capacity to analyze student behaviors in library information systems, often to attest to a library's value with respect to student learning outcomes.48”

    From Learning Analytics and the Academic Library: Professional Ethics Commitments at a Crossroads (2018) · cites this paper as [48]

    The EDITORIAL passages discuss tracking learning behaviors and outcomes and the challenges of learning analytics, but do not discuss libraries, library information systems, or using analytics to demonstrate a library’s value. Searches for library analytics capacity and library value returned no passage addressing those claims. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Eynon, R.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Eynon, Rebecca
Venue
Learning, Media and Technology
Published
2015-10-02
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
407-411
ISSN
  • 1743-9884 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9892
OpenAlex
W2201747886
Cited by
29
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Learning Media and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Digital Education and Society
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology in Learning
Keywords
quantified self, learning analytics, educational technology, data tracking, self-monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review