Digital neocolonialism and massive open online courses (MOOCs): colonial pasts and neoliberal futures
Open accessAbstract
Through evaluating dominant MOOC platforms created by Western universities, I argue that MOOCs on such platforms tend to embed Western-centric epistemologies and propagate this without questioning their global relevance. Consequently, such MOOCs can be detrimental when educating diverse and complex participants as they erode local and indigenous knowledge systems. Arguing that the digital divide is an exacerbation of historical inequalities, I draw parallels between colonial education, specifically across Sub-Saharan Africa, and ‘digital neocolonialism’ through Western MOOC platforms. I analyse similarities in ideology, assumptions, and methods of control. Highlighting evolving forms of coloniality, I include contemporary problems created by neoliberal techno-capitalist agendas, such as the commodification of education. Balance is needed between the opportunities offered through MOOCs and the harms they cause through overshadowing marginalised knowledges and framing disruptive technologies as the saviour. While recommending solutions for inclusion of marginalised voices, further problems such as adverse incorporation are raised.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A manifestation of algorithmic coloniality in higher education teaching and learning is the use of online platforms rooted in Western-centric epistemologies, ontologies, and values.
“the use of online platforms that are rooted in Western-centric epistemologies, ontologies, and values (Adam 2019)”
From A decolonial approach to AI in higher education teaching and learning: strategies for undoing the ethics of digital neocolonialism (2023) · cites this paper as Adam 2019
Dominant MOOC platforms created by Western universities tend to embed Western-centric epistemologies.
“dominant MOOC platforms created by Western universities and how these platforms tend to embed Western-centric epistemologies”
From A decolonial approach to AI in higher education teaching and learning: strategies for undoing the ethics of digital neocolonialism (2023) · cites this paper as Adam ' s (2019)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fischer, G., Lundin, J., & Lindberg, J. O. (2020) · The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology · doi:10.1108/ijilt-04-2020-0051 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Zembylas, M. (2023) · Learning, Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2021.2010094 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Digital degrowth: toward radically sustainable education technology
Selwyn, N. (2024) · Learning, Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2022.2159978 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Online teaching in response to student protests and campus shutdowns: academics’ perspectives
Czerniewicz, L., Trotter, H., & Haupt, G. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0170-1 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
- Authors
- Adam, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Adam, Taskeen
- ORCID
- Adam, Taskeen
- Venue
- Learning, Media and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-07-03
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 365-380
- ISSN
- 1743-9884 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9892
- OpenAlex
- W2956969047
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 12.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Learning Media and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- massive open online courses, MOOC platforms, coloniality, Western epistemology, indigenous knowledge, digital divide, colonial education, sub-Saharan Africa, neoliberalism, commodification of education, inclusion, disruptive technologies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review