Cited by 113Digital Education and SocietyOnline Learning and AnalyticsDecolonial Thought and Epistemologies

Digital neocolonialism and massive open online courses (MOOCs): colonial pasts and neoliberal futures

Open access
Adam, Taskeen·2019·Learning, Media and Technology

Abstract

Through evaluating dominant MOOC platforms created by Western universities, I argue that MOOCs on such platforms tend to embed Western-centric epistemologies and propagate this without questioning their global relevance. Consequently, such MOOCs can be detrimental when educating diverse and complex participants as they erode local and indigenous knowledge systems. Arguing that the digital divide is an exacerbation of historical inequalities, I draw parallels between colonial education, specifically across Sub-Saharan Africa, and ‘digital neocolonialism’ through Western MOOC platforms. I analyse similarities in ideology, assumptions, and methods of control. Highlighting evolving forms of coloniality, I include contemporary problems created by neoliberal techno-capitalist agendas, such as the commodification of education. Balance is needed between the opportunities offered through MOOCs and the harms they cause through overshadowing marginalised knowledges and framing disruptive technologies as the saviour. While recommending solutions for inclusion of marginalised voices, further problems such as adverse incorporation are raised.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17439884.2019.1640740

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adam, T.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Adam, Taskeen
Venue
Learning, Media and Technology
Published
2019-07-03
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
365-380
ISSN
  • 1743-9884 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9892
OpenAlex
W2956969047
Cited by
113
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5
FWCI
12.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning Media and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
Keywords
massive open online courses, MOOC platforms, coloniality, Western epistemology, indigenous knowledge, digital divide, colonial education, sub-Saharan Africa, neoliberalism, commodification of education, inclusion, disruptive technologies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review