Cited by 298Gender Roles and Identity StudiesMale Reproductive Health StudiesAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

Questioning gender norms with men to improve health outcomes: Evidence of impact

Barker, G., Ricardo, C., Nascimento, M., Olukoya, A., Santos, C.·2010·Global Public Health

Abstract

This article describes a review of 58 evaluation studies of programmes with men and boys in sexual and reproductive health (including HIV prevention, treatment, care and support); father involvement; gender-based violence; maternal, newborn and child health; and gender socialisation more broadly. While few of the programmes go beyond the pilot stage, or a relatively short-term timeframe, they offer compelling evidence that well-designed programmes with men and boys can lead to positive changes in their behaviours and attitudes related to sexual and reproductive health; maternal, newborn and child health; their interaction with their children; their use of violence against women; their questioning of violence with other men; and their health-seeking behaviour. The evidence indicates that programmes that incorporate a gender-transformative approach and promote gender-equitable relationships between men and women are more effective in producing behaviour change than narrowly focused interventions, as are programmes which reach beyond the individual level to the social context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17441690902942464

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barker, G., Ricardo, C., Nascimento, M., Olukoya, A., & Santos, C.
Affiliations
  • International Center for Research on Women (US)
  • Promundo (BR)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Barker, G.
Venue
Global Public Health
Published
2010-09
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
539-553
ISSN
  • 1744-1692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-1706
OpenAlex
W2141119306
Cited by
297
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
10.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Global Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
men and boys, gender norms, gender-transformative approaches, sexual and reproductive health, HIV prevention, father involvement, gender-based violence, maternal, newborn and child health, gender socialization, health-seeking behavior, behavior change, program evaluation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Fathers, Gender Identity, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Paternal Behavior, Sexual Behavior, Sex Education, Stereotyping, Violence, Reproductive Medicine, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review