Cited by 61Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Barriers to appropriate care for mothers and infants during the perinatal period in rural Afghanistan: a qualitative assessment

Open access
Newbrander, William, Natiq, Kayhan, Shahim, Shafiqullah, Hamid, Najibullah, Skena, Naomi Brill·2014·Global Public Health

Abstract

This study, conducted in five rural districts in Afghanistan, used qualitative methods to explore traditional practices of women, families and communities related to maternal and newborn care, and sociocultural and health system issues that create access barriers. The traditional practices discussed include delayed bathing of mothers and delayed breastfeeding of infants, seclusion of women after childbirth, restricted maternal diet, and use of traditional home remedies and self-medication instead of care in health facilities to treat maternal and newborn conditions. This study also looked at community support structures, transportation and care-seeking behaviour for maternal and newborn problems which create access barriers. Sociocultural barriers to better maternal-newborn health include shame about utilisation of maternal and neonatal services, women's inability to seek care without being accompanied by a male relative, and care-seeking from mullahs for serious health concerns. This study also found a high level of post-partum depression. Targeted and more effective behaviour-change communication programmes are needed. This study presents a set of behaviour-change messages to reduce maternal and newborn mortality associated with births occurring at home in rural communities. This study recommends using religious leaders, trained health workers, family health action groups and radio to disseminate these messages.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17441692.2013.827735

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Uganda and Afghanistan, delaying bathing was not a common practice.

    “This practice varied across settings, for example, in Somalia, it was observed in 99.2% (95% CI 97.1 to 99.9) of newborns born in the PHCCs,36 while in Uganda and Afghanistan it was not a common practice.48 56”
  • Delaying bathing practice varied across settings.

    “This practice varied across settings, for example, in Somalia, it was observed in 99.2% (95% CI 97.1 to 99.9) of newborns born in the PHCCs,36 while in Uganda and Afghanistan it was not a common practice.48 56”
  • In Afghanistan, women did not initiate breast feeding immediately because they understood that they needed to first wash their breast.

    “In Afghanistan, women did not initiate breast feeding immediately because they understood that they needed to first wash their breast.56”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sato M. Challenges and successes in family planning in Afghanistan. Management sciences for health occasional papers no. 6. Cambridge, MA [online] 2007 Retrieved from http://www.msh.org/Documents/OccasionalPapers/upload/Challenges-and-Successes-in-Family-Planning-in-Afghanistan.pdf#search=%22ChallengesSuccessesinFamilyPlanninginAfghanistan%22

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Newbrander, W., Natiq, K., Shahim, S., Hamid, N., & Skena, N. B.
Affiliations
Management Sciences for Health (US)
Corresponding author
Newbrander, William
Venue
Global Public Health
Published
2013-09-05
Volume
9
Issue
sup1
Pages
S93-S109
ISSN
  • 1744-1692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-1706
OpenAlex
W2092661533
Cited by
61
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • United States Agency for International Development
  • Health Promotion Agency
  • Ministry of Public Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
maternal and newborn care, perinatal care, rural Afghanistan, traditional practices, delayed bathing, delayed breastfeeding, maternal diet, self-medication, care-seeking behavior, access barriers, socio-cultural barriers, postpartum depression, behavior change communication, home birth, maternal and newborn mortality, religious leaders
MeSH terms
Afghanistan, Child Health Services, Culture, Diet, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Medicine, Traditional, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Quality of Health Care, Religion and Medicine, Focus Groups, Perinatal Care, Rural Health Services, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review