Cited by 112Urban and Rural Development ChallengesCOVID-19 Prevention and ImpactLegal Issues in South Africa

Exploring the impact of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on informal settlements in Tshwane Gauteng Province, South Africa

Open access
Nyashanu, Mathew, Simbanegavi, Prisca, Gibson, Linda·2020·Global Public Health

Abstract

Informal settlements remain a public health problem as they lack basic infrastructure. Furthermore, it is challenging to enforce public health regulations and protocols to prevent the spread of infection during a pandemic. This paper was set out to explore the impact of lockdown during COVID-19 among people living in informal settlements. An exploratory qualitative design was utilised. Purposive sampling was used to select research participants. In-depth one-to-one interviews were held involving 30 research participants through a WhatsApp online telephone platform. A thematic approach underpinned by the four stages of data analysis in interpretive phenomenological analysis was utilised to analyse the data. The study found that during the the research participants were affected by lack of space to practice social distancing, over-burdened infrastructure, lack of savings, loss of income and shortage of food, hunger and diseases, anxiety and depression and poor access to education. There is a need to prioritise the needs of informal settlers and endeavour to establish permanent homes. Health promotion and communication initiatives and pandemic awareness programmes are needed to mitigate the impact of lockdown during a pandemic in informal settlements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17441692.2020.1805787

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Informal settlements lack basic infrastructure and municipal services such as water and sanitation, stormwater infrastructure and electricity reticulation.

    “As a result, they lack basic infrastructure and municipal services such as water and sanitation, stormwater infrastructure and electricity reticulation among others (Nyashanu et al. 2020; Wiltgen et al. 2021).”

    From Flood vulnerability in township informal settlements (2026) · cites this paper as Nyashanu et al. 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nyashanu, M., Simbanegavi, P., & Gibson, L.
Affiliations
  • Nottingham Trent University (GB)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Corresponding author
Nyashanu, Mathew
Venue
Global Public Health
Published
2020-08-11
Volume
15
Issue
10
Pages
1443-1453
ISSN
  • 1744-1692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-1706
OpenAlex
W3048116308
Cited by
112
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 1
FWCI
39.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in South Africa
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown, informal settlements, slums, social distancing, food insecurity, income loss, mental health, anxiety and depression, access to education, public health communication, health promotion
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, Physical Distancing, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Communicable Disease Control, Female, Humans, Male, Pneumonia, Viral, Residence Characteristics, South Africa, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review