CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12Gender, Labor, and Family DynamicsWork-Family Balance ChallengesFamily Dynamics and Relationships

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

IS CHILDCARE LEAVE EFFECTIVE IN RAISING FERTILITY IN JAPAN?

Lee, Sang-Hyop, Ogawa, Naohiro, Matsukura, Rikiya·2009·Asian Population Studies
DOI 10.1080/17441730903351750
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper estimates the effect of childcare leave on married women's fertility in Japan, based on data from the 2007 National Survey on Work and Family. The analysis takes into account how childcare leave influences fertility through its intermediate effects on women's selection into the labor market, job tenure, wages and the opportunity cost of children. Results indicate a strong effect of childcare leave on years of continuous job tenure with the same employer, and on predicted wages for full-time working women. Taking childcare leave for the first child increases the percentage progressing from first to second birth by six percentage points. There is also clear evidence that lowering the opportunity cost of children increases fertility, net of the effect of childcare leave, which affects fertility via the opportunity cost of children.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17441730903351750

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Averrett S. L., 2001, Southern Economic Journal, 68, 402
  2. Baum C. L., 2003, Southern Economic Journal, 69, 772, 10.2307/1061651 · DOI
  3. Berger M., 2005, How Does Job-protected Maternity Leave Affect Mothers’ Employment and Infant Health?
  4. Berger L., 2005, Economic Journal, 115, F29, 10.1111/j.0013-0133.2005.00971.x · DOI
  5. Büttner T., 1990, Population and Development Review, 16, 539, 10.2307/1972835 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 2003, Annual Report on Japanese Economy and Public Finance/Economic Survey of Japan
  7. Clark R. L., 1992, American Economic Review, 82, 336
  8. 10.2307/1912352 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Kawaguchi A., 2007, Population Change, Labor Markets, and Sustainable Growth: Towards a New Economic Paradigm, 189, 10.1016/S0573-8555(07)81008-X · DOI
  10. Klerman J. A., 1999, Demography, 36, 2145, 10.2307/2648104 · DOI
  11. Lalive R., 2005, Does Parental Leave Affect Fertility and Return-to-work? Evidence from a “True Natural Experiment”, 10.2139/ssrn.731766 · DOI
  12. Lee L.-F., 1981, Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, 345
  13. Matsukura R., 2007, The Japanese Economy, 34, 82, 10.2753/JES1097-203X340103 · DOI
  14. Ogawa N., 2003, Journal of Population Research, 20, 89, 10.1007/BF03031797 · DOI
  15. Ogawa N., 2005, Perceptions of Family in the Age of Very Low Fertility, 107
  16. 10.1086/452151 · DOI
  17. 10.1086/209827 · DOI
  18. Retherford R. D., 2006, The Baby Bust: Who Will Do the Work? Who Will Pay the Taxes?’, 5
  19. 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2005.07.001 · DOI
  20. Schönberg U., 2007, Maternity Leave Legislation, Female Labor Supply, and the Family Wage Gap, 10.2139/ssrn.981179 · DOI
  21. Shigeno Y., 2003, The Quarterly of Social Security Research, 39, 43
  22. Suruga t., 2002, The Quarterly of Social Security Research, 37, 371
  23. Suruga T., 2003, Japanese Journal of Research on Household Economics, 59, 56
  24. Suzuki , T. 2006 ‘Lowest-low fertility and governmental actions in Japan’ , paper presented to the International Conference on Declining Fertility in East and Southeast Asian Countries, Hitotsubashi Collaboration Center, Tokyo, 14–15 December .
  25. Winegarden C. R., 1995, Southern Economic Journal, 61, 1020, 10.2307/1060738 · DOI
  26. Yamaguchi K., 2005, Japanese Journal of Research on Household Economics, 66, 57
  27. Yoshida H., 2006, ‘Lowest-low fertility and governmental actions in Japan: a comment’

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Lee, S.-H., Ogawa, N., & Matsukura, R.
Venue
Asian Population Studies
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2009-11-01
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
349-369
ISSN
  • 1744-1730 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-1749
DOI
10.1080/17441730903351750
OpenAlex
W2092931460
Cited by
12
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Asian Population Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
childcare leave, fertility, married women, job tenure, wages, opportunity cost of children, labor force participation, work-family balance, Japan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review