Cited by 131Family Dynamics and RelationshipsSocial Policies and FamilyGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

Estimating Fertility Responses to Policy Measures in the German Democratic Republic

Buttner, Thomas, Lutz, Wolfgang·1990·Population and Development Review

Abstract

Everywhere the advent of industrial society and correspondingly high incomes has been accompanied by a fall in births. If one could only explain the fall unambiguously policy measures to counter it could be readily devised. Unfortunately there are many explanations, and from each follows a different policy prescription. If the income derived from women's work in offices and industry has become so high that they cannot afford the time to have children, then payments from the State to cover what they lose through child raising will offset that. If the obstacle is the cost of clothing and educating children to present high standards, then family allowances will serve and be much less expensive than replacing women's salaries. But if the reason for couples holding back is the danger of divorce, where the children would be a handicap to the single parent for work and for remarriage, then state subsidy is not so obviously the answer. And if the obstacle to childbearing is a shift in the culture from a familistic to an individual orientation then perhaps no affordable amount of money will induce people to have children. One could go on this way. If parents do not have children because they cannot find living premises sufficiently large for them, then housing subsidies are the answer. Some explanations of the fall in fertility lead to simple policy solutions; others would seem not to be amenable to any kind of policy. The inability to distinguish among competing theories of the fall…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1972835

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Buttner and Lutz (1990) estimated that the East German 1976-1977 policy package resulted in an increase in the total fertility rate of 15 percent, about 0.2 children per woman, and that the effect was strongest on the second and third births.

    “Buttner and Lutz (1990) more precisely estimated that they resulted in an increase in the total fertility rate (TFR) of 15 percent (about 0.2 children per woman) and that the effect was strongest on the second and third births.”

    From Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections (2025) · cites this paper as Buttner and Lutz (1990)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buttner, T., & Lutz, W.
Venue
Population and Development Review
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1990-09
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
539
ISSN
0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985841365
Cited by
131
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 18 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
11.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Population and Development Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policies and Family
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
fertility policy, fertility decline, East Germany, West Germany, Austria, maternity leave, family allowances, child allowance, housing subsidies, family planning policy, East-West comparison, divorce risk, childcare costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review