The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Basophil activation test in the food allergy clinic: its current use and future applications
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“BAT offers greater specificity and higher negative predictive values compared to prick tests and specific IgE measurements, without compromising sensitivity or positive predictive values [194,207].”
From Pollen–Food Allergy Syndrome: Allergens, Clinical Insights, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges (2024) · cites this paper as [207]
In the citing paper
“BAT is particularly useful for differentiating cross-reactivity in PFAS from genuine primary food allergies [207].”
From Pollen–Food Allergy Syndrome: Allergens, Clinical Insights, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges (2024) · cites this paper as [207]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Monitoring human basophil activation via CD63 monoclonal antibody 435
Knol, E. F., Mul, F. P. J., Jansen, H., Calafat, J., & Roos, D. (1991) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/0091-6749(91)90094-5 · Cited by 421 · cited 1×
“The lysosomal-associated membrane protein CD63, located on the membrane of secretory lysosomes inside the basophil and becomes expressed on the plasma membrane as the basophil degranulates, is the most frequently used marker to assess basophil activation [3].”
Hill, D. A., Grundmeier, R. W., Ram, G., & Spergel, J. M. (2016) · BMC Pediatrics · doi:10.1186/s12887-016-0673-z · Cited by 243
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- 10.1111/all.15902 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/all.15939 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.11.016 · DOI
- 10.1111/imr.12639 · DOI
- 10.1111/all.14747 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/cea.12964 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11882-018-0831-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.04.039 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.03.035 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03292.x · DOI
- 10.3390/jcm9123942 · DOI
- 10.1111/pai.14012 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02754.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.12.039 · DOI
- 10.1111/cea.12515 · DOI
- 10.1159/000312126 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02432.x · DOI
- 10.2332/allergolint.08-OA-0023 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.06.041 · DOI
- 10.1067/mai.2001.115755 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.04.014 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.313.7056.518 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.312.7038.1074 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.anai.2017.02.010 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01191.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.09.036 · DOI
- 10.1111/all.13353 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.09.041 · DOI
- 10.1111/cea.13174 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.11.020 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11882-016-0604-y · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.10.023 · DOI
- 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000640 · DOI
- 10.1111/all.15797 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.06.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.09.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.anai.2018.04.020 · DOI
- 10.1111/all.15875 · DOI
- 10.1111/cea.13307 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.07.028 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.10.038 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa1200435 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.05.022 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02390-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.03.028 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.04.056 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.05.038 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31793-3 · DOI
- 10.1111/pai.12070 · DOI
- 10.1111/all.15212 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.05.031 · DOI
- 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30029-X · DOI
- 10.1186/s13601-016-0098-7 · DOI
- 10.1002/cyto.b.21537 · DOI
- Pascal M, Nopp A, Mayorga C. Building confidence in the basophil activation test: standardization and external quality assurance -an EAACI task force. Allergy. 2020;75:115–116.
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.03.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.08.006 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pollen–Food Allergy Syndrome: Allergens, Clinical Insights, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges
Haidar, L., Bănărescu, C. F., Uța, C., Moldovan, S. I., Zimbru, E.-L., Zimbru, R.-I., Ciurariu, E., Georgescu, M., & Panaitescu, C. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15010066 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Bergmann, M. M., & Santos, A. F.
- Affiliations
- Pediatric allergy unit, Department of Women, Children and Adolescents, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Women and Children’s Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
- ORCID
- Santos, Alexandra F.
- Venue
- Expert Review of Clinical Immunology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2024-04-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1297-1304
- ISSN
- 1744-666X
- 1744-8409
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review




