The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Externalities of Strong Social Capital: Post-Tsunami Recovery in Southeast India
Abstract
Much research has implied that social capital functions as an unqualified ‘public good’, enhancing governance, economic performance, and quality-of-life. Scholars of disaster have extended this concept to posit that social capital provides non-excludable benefits to whole communities after major crises. Using qualitative methods to analyse data from villages in Tamil Nadu, India following the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, this article demonstrates that high levels of social capital simultaneously provided strong benefits and equally strong negative externalities, especially to those already on the periphery of society. In these villages, high levels of social capital reduced barriers to collective action for members of the uur panchayats (hamlet councils) and parish councils, speeding up their recovery and connecting them to aid organizations, but at the same time reinforced obstacles to recovery for women, Dalits, migrants, and Muslims. These localized findings have important implications for academic studies of social capital and policy formation for future disasters and recovery schemes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital
Putnam, R. D. (1995) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.1995.0002 · Cited by 14,037
Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research
King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994) · Princeton University Press · doi:10.1515/9781400821211 · Cited by 7,225
Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy
Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000) · The World Bank Research Observer · doi:10.1093/wbro/15.2.225 · Cited by 4,339 · cited 2×
“Villages and hamlets in Nagapattinam with both bonding and linking social networks fared better than those solely with bonding connections (cf. Woolcock & Narayan, 2000), but such localities practiced discrimination with some regularity.”
BackgroundPutnam, R. D. (2007) · Scandinavian Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x · Cited by 4,027
Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic
Berman, S. (1997) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.1997.0008 · Cited by 1,108
Cited by
Social Capital and Community Resilience
Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2015) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764214550299 · Cited by 2,331
Self-citationTrust, Risk, and Time Preferences After a Natural Disaster: Experimental Evidence from Thailand
Cassar, A., Healy, A., & von Kessler, C. (2017) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.042 · Cited by 599
The Psychological Causes of Panic Buying Following a Health Crisis
Yuen, K. F., Wang, X., Ma, F., & Li, K. X. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17103513 · Cited by 514
Sadri, A. M., Ukkusuri, S. V., Lee, S., Clawson, R., Aldrich, D., Nelson, M. S., Seipel, J., & Kelly, D. (2018) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-017-3103-0 · Cited by 265
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Aldrich, D. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Civil Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-99
- ISSN
- 1744-8689 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-8697
- OpenAlex
- W1993882121
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 23.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Externalities of Strong Social Capital: Post-Tsunami Recovery in Southeast India. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17448689.2011.553441
- The paper
- Aldrich, D. P. (2011). The Externalities of Strong Social Capital: Post-Tsunami Recovery in Southeast India. Journal of Civil Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2011.553441
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.