The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automated detection and classification of the proximal humerus fracture by using deep learning algorithm
Open accessAbstract
Background and purpose - We aimed to evaluate the ability of artificial intelligence (a deep learning algorithm) to detect and classify proximal humerus fractures using plain anteroposterior shoulder radiographs. Patients and methods - 1,891 images (1 image per person) of normal shoulders (n = 515) and 4 proximal humerus fracture types (greater tuberosity, 346; surgical neck, 514; 3-part, 269; 4-part, 247) classified by 3 specialists were evaluated. We trained a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) after augmentation of a training dataset. The ability of the CNN, as measured by top-1 accuracy, area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity/specificity, and Youden index, in comparison with humans (28 general physicians, 11 general orthopedists, and 19 orthopedists specialized in the shoulder) to detect and classify proximal humerus fractures was evaluated. Results - The CNN showed a high performance of 96% top-1 accuracy, 1.00 AUC, 0.99/0.97 sensitivity/specificity, and 0.97 Youden index for distinguishing normal shoulders from proximal humerus fractures. In addition, the CNN showed promising results with 65-86% top-1 accuracy, 0.90-0.98 AUC, 0.88/0.83-0.97/0.94 sensitivity/specificity, and 0.71-0.90 Youden index for classifying fracture type. When compared with the human groups, the CNN showed superior performance to that of general physicians and orthopedists, similar performance to orthopedists specialized in the shoulder, and the superior performance of the CNN was more marked in complex 3- and 4-part fractures. Interpretation - The use of artificial intelligence can accurately detect and classify proximal humerus fractures on plain shoulder AP radiographs. Further studies are necessary to determine the feasibility of applying artificial intelligence in the clinic and whether its use could improve care and outcomes compared with current orthopedic assessments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21056 · Cited by 14,362
Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives
Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Vincent, P. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.50 · Cited by 13,001
Gulshan, V., Peng, L., Coram, M., Stumpe, M. C., Wu, D., Narayanaswamy, A., Venugopalan, S., Widner, K., Madams, T., Cuadros, J., et al. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.17216 · Cited by 7,697
Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation.
NEER, C. S. (1970) · PubMed · Cited by 1,954
Lakhani, P., & Sundaram, B. (2017) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2017162326 · Cited by 1,775
Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions
Kooi, T., Litjens, G., van Ginneken, B., Gubern-Mérida, A., Sánchez, C. I., Mann, R., den Heeten, A., & Karssemeijer, N. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.07.007 · Cited by 965
Machine learning and radiology
Wang, S., & Summers, R. M. (2012) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2012.02.005 · Cited by 697
Yu-Jen Chen, Y.-J., Hua, K.-L., Hsu, C.-H., Cheng, W.-H., & Hidayati, S. C. (2015) · OncoTargets and Therapy · doi:10.2147/ott.s80733 · Cited by 542
Cited by
Rasmy, L., Xiang, Y., Xie, Z., Tao, C., & Zhi, D. (2021) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00455-y · Cited by 886
Artificial Intelligence in Fracture Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Kuo, R. Y. L., Harrison, C., Curran, T.-A., Jones, B., Freethy, A., Cussons, D., Stewart, M., Collins, G. S., & Furniss, D. (2022) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.211785 · Cited by 365
Deep learning predicts hip fracture using confounding patient and healthcare variables
Badgeley, M. A., Zech, J. R., Oakden-Rayner, L., Glicksberg, B. S., Liu, M., Gale, W., McConnell, M. V., Percha, B., Snyder, T. M., & Dudley, J. T. (2019) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0105-1 · Cited by 290
Liu, P.-R., Zhang, J.-Y., Xue, M.-D., Duan, Y.-Y., Hu, J.-L., Liu, S.-X., Xie, Y., Wang, H.-L., Wang, J.-W., Huo, T.-T., et al. (2021) · Current Medical Science · doi:10.1007/s11596-021-2501-4 · Cited by 45
Schilcher, J., Nilsson, A., Andlid, O., & Eklund, A. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107704 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Chung, S. W., Han, S. S., Lee, J. W., Oh, K.-S., Kim, N. R., Yoon, J. P., Kim, J. Y., Moon, S. H., Kwon, J., Lee, H.-J., Noh, Y.-M., & Kim, Y.
- Venue
- Acta Orthopaedica
- Published
- 2018-03-26
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 468-473
- ISSN
- 1745-3674 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-3682
- OpenAlex
- W2793251588
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 33.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated detection and classification of the proximal humerus fracture by using deep learning algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17453674.2018.1453714
- The paper
- Chung, S. W., Han, S. S., Lee, J. W., Oh, K.-S., Kim, N. R., Yoon, J. P., Kim, J. Y., Moon, S. H., Kwon, J., Lee, H.-J., Noh, Y.-M., & Kim, Y. (2018). Automated detection and classification of the proximal humerus fracture by using deep learning algorithm. Acta Orthopaedica. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1453714
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.