Cited by 47Art Therapy and Mental HealthArt Education and DevelopmentChild Therapy and Development

Processes of change in school-based art therapy with children: a systematic qualitative study

Deboys, Rachel, Holttum, Sue, Wright, Karen·2017·International Journal of Art Therapy

Abstract

Although theoretical processes of art therapy with children have been suggested, they have lacked a systematic research basis. This systematic qualitative study explored children’s school-based one-to-one art therapy in order to create a theory of change. Across two primary schools, 14 children were interviewed individually, as were their parents, teachers and art therapists (total N = 40). All children had received art therapy within the previous 12 months. Children completed an art activity to aid the interview process. Interview data were analysed using grounded theory methodology. The analysis generated a preliminary model with three components. ‘Component 1—school context’ highlights the systemic nature of art therapy as well as its mystique to those not directly involved. ‘Component 2—core model’ describes art therapy as individualised and child-centred. Art-doing and making were considered central to children’s expression and developing understandings. ‘Component 3—change and no change’ describes the connection between identifying therapy aims and perceiving change. Recommendations are that art therapy be considered for children struggling to verbalise their difficulties; that therapists focus on therapeutic experiences being fun and enjoyable for the child, as well as embedded within the child’s system; and lastly that clear target problems are identified at the start of therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17454832.2016.1262882

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The art-making process helps individuals and groups symbolize and externalize experiences that are not easily verbalized and concretize internal conflicts to facilitate perspective-taking and reflection.

    “The art-making process helps individuals and groups symbolize and externalize experiences that are not easily verbalized and concretize internal conflicts to facilitate perspective-taking and reflection (Deboys et al., 2017; Gabel and Robb, 2017; Abbing et al., 2018; Czamanski-Cohen et al., 2019; Bosgraaf et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deboys, R., Holttum, S., & Wright, K.
Corresponding author
Deboys, Rachel
Venue
International Journal of Art Therapy
Published
2016-12-22
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
118-131
ISSN
  • 1745-4832 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-4840
OpenAlex
W2567236631
Cited by
47
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
40.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Art Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • Create (Canterbury Christ Church University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
Keywords
school-based art therapy, children, theory of change, artistic creation, school context, therapeutic change, nonverbal children, elementary school

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review