Perceptual-cognitive skill training and its transfer to expert performance in the field: Future research directions
Open accessAbstract
Perceptual‐cognitive skills training provides a potentially valuable method for training athletes on key skills, such as anticipation and decision‐making. It can be used when athletes are unable to physically train or are unable to experience repeated key situations from their sport. In this article, we review research on perceptual‐cognitive skills training and describe future research areas focusing on a number of key theories and principles. The main aim of any training intervention should be the efficacy of retention and transfer of learning from training to field situations, which should be the key consideration when designing the representative tasks used in perceptual‐cognitive skills training. We review the principles that seek to create practice tasks that replicate those found in the field, so as to increase the amount of transfer that occurs. These principles are perception–action coupling, the contextual interference effect and contextual information, which suggest there should be a high level of similarity between training and real‐life performance when designing perceptual‐cognitive skills training. In the final section, we discuss the transfer of retained skill acquisition from perceptual‐cognitive skills training to field performance, which we suggest to be the key area for future research in this area.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Representative training designs facilitate training that holistically integrates motor processes with perceptual-cognitive components.
“(2) facilitating training that holistically integrates motor processes (e.g., specific techniques) with perceptual-cognitive components (e.g., decision-making and tactical awareness; Ford et al., 2010; Broadbent et al., 2015; Farrow and Robertson, 2017);”
From Skill Training Periodization in “Specialist” Sports Coaching—An Introduction of the “PoST” Framework for Skill Development (2019) · cites this paper as Broadbent et al., 2015
Cites
A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition
Magill, R. A., & Hall, K. G. (1990) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/0167-9457(90)90005-x · Cited by 701 · see citing works
Representative learning design and functionality of research and practice in sport
Pinder, R. A., Davids, K., Renshaw, I., & Araújo, D. (2011) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.33.1.146 · Cited by 692 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…over the use of representative tasks for training, particularly in regard to the ecological validity of this approach, or how closely the actions in the training environment replicate those in the performance environment (Pinder et al., 2011a; Van der Kamp, Rivas, Van Doorn, & Savelsbergh, 2008).”
BackgroundCognitive Effort and Motor Learning
Lee, T. D., Swinnen, S. P., & Serrien, D. J. (1994) · Quest · doi:10.1080/00336297.1994.10484130 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lebares, C. C., Guvva, E. V., Olaru, M., Sugrue, L. P., Staffaroni, A. M., Delucchi, K. L., Kramer, J. H., Ascher, N. L., & Harris, H. W. (2019) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4108 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Otte, F. W., Millar, S.-K., & Klatt, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living · doi:10.3389/fspor.2019.00061 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
“, specific techniques) with perceptual-cognitive components (e.g., decision-making and tactical awareness; Ford et al., 2010; Broadbent et al., 2015; Farrow and Robertson, 2017); and (3) developing training designs that recreate action fidelity (i.”
BackgroundQuantifying contextual interference and its effect on skill transfer in skilled youth tennis players
Buszard, T., Reid, M., Krause, L., Kovalchik, S., & Farrow, D. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01931 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
- Authors
- Broadbent, D. P., Causer, J., Williams, A. M., & Ford, P. R.
- Affiliations
- Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
- Brunel University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Broadbent, David P.
- Venue
- European Journal of Sport Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-09-24
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 322-331
- ISSN
- 1536-7290 (ISSN-L)
- 1746-1391
- OpenAlex
- W1967242439
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- bura.brunel.ac.uk
- Locations
- European Journal of Sport Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Keywords
- transfer of learning, sports training, anticipation, decision-making, perception-action coupling, contextual interference, contextual information, skill retention, expert performance
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Decision Making, Humans, Learning, Motor Skills, Perception, Practice, Psychological, Retention, Psychology, Athletic Performance, Anticipation, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review