Cited by 257Sport Psychology and PerformanceSports and Physical Education ResearchSports Performance and Training

Perceptual-cognitive skill training and its transfer to expert performance in the field: Future research directions

Open access
Broadbent, David P., Causer, Joe, Williams, A. Mark, Ford, Paul R.·2015·European Journal of Sport Science

Abstract

Perceptual‐cognitive skills training provides a potentially valuable method for training athletes on key skills, such as anticipation and decision‐making. It can be used when athletes are unable to physically train or are unable to experience repeated key situations from their sport. In this article, we review research on perceptual‐cognitive skills training and describe future research areas focusing on a number of key theories and principles. The main aim of any training intervention should be the efficacy of retention and transfer of learning from training to field situations, which should be the key consideration when designing the representative tasks used in perceptual‐cognitive skills training. We review the principles that seek to create practice tasks that replicate those found in the field, so as to increase the amount of transfer that occurs. These principles are perception–action coupling, the contextual interference effect and contextual information, which suggest there should be a high level of similarity between training and real‐life performance when designing perceptual‐cognitive skills training. In the final section, we discuss the transfer of retained skill acquisition from perceptual‐cognitive skills training to field performance, which we suggest to be the key area for future research in this area.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17461391.2014.957727

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Broadbent, D. P., Causer, J., Williams, A. M., & Ford, P. R.
Affiliations
  • Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
  • Brunel University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Broadbent, David P.
Venue
European Journal of Sport Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-09-24
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
322-331
ISSN
  • 1536-7290 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-1391
OpenAlex
W1967242439
Cited by
257
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Sport Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
transfer of learning, sports training, anticipation, decision-making, perception-action coupling, contextual interference, contextual information, skill retention, expert performance
MeSH terms
Cognition, Decision Making, Humans, Learning, Motor Skills, Perception, Practice, Psychological, Retention, Psychology, Athletic Performance, Anticipation, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review