Cited by 692Sport Psychology and PerformanceSports and Physical Education ResearchPhysical Education and Pedagogy

Representative learning design and functionality of research and practice in sport

Open access
Pinder, Ross A., Davids, Keith, Renshaw, Ian, Araújo, Duarte·2011·Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Abstract

Egon Brunswik proposed the concept of “representative design” for psychological experimentation, which has historically been overlooked or confused with another of Brunswik’s terms, ecological validity. In this article, we reiterate the distinction between these two important concepts and highlight the relevance of the term representative design for sports psychology, practice, and experimental design. We draw links with ideas on learning design in the constraints-led approach to motor learning and nonlinear pedagogy. We propose the adoption of a new term, representative learning design , to help sport scientists, experimental psychologists, and pedagogues recognize the potential application of Brunswik’s original concepts, and to ensure functionality and action fidelity in training and learning environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/jsep.33.1.146

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The merit of representative learning designs has been supported by an extensive body of research.

    “The merit of representative learning designs (i.e., measured by the degree to which skills acquired in practice transfer to the competitive environment; Renshaw and Chow, 2019) has been supported by an extensive body of research (see Pinder et al., 2011; Krause et al., 2018, 2019).”

    From Skill Training Periodization in “Specialist” Sports Coaching—An Introduction of the “PoST” Framework for Skill Development (2019) · cites this paper as Pinder et al., 2011

    The “Representative Learning Design” section cites studies of training drills and cricket batting to illustrate why practice should reflect competitive conditions. It supports the merit of representative designs, but does not establish that an extensive body of research has demonstrated transfer of skills from practice to competition; it presents representative learning design as a proposed framework. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The constraints-led approach, as an ecological model, advocates that open systems are of non-linear nature and involve a mutual relationship with the performance environment.

    “In brief, the CLA, as an ecological model, advocates the underlying principle that open systems (e.g., athletes within invasion games or team ball games) are of non-linear nature and involve a mutual relationship with the performance environment (Pinder et al., 2011; Renshaw et al., 2016).”
  • Representative training designs recreate action fidelity and functionality.

    “(3) developing training designs that recreate action fidelity (i.e., the degree of correspondence between emerging behavior in a training task compared to competitive performance; Travassos et al., 2012) and functionality (i.e., the achievement of goals in the performance environment that are based on actions and constraints that athletes have been exposed to in the learning context; Pinder et al.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [9]9. Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  2. [24]24. Hammond, K.R., & Stewart, T.R. (Eds.). (2001). The Essential Brunswik: Beginnings, Explications, Applications. New York: Oxford University Press.
  3. [25]25. Hristovski, R., Davids, K., Araújo, D., & Button, C. (2006). How boxers decide to punch a target: Emergent behaviour in nonlinear dynamical movement systems. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 5 (CSSI), 60-73.
  4. [29]29. Jobson, S.A., Nevill, A.M., Palmer, G.S., Jeukendrup, A.E., Doherty, M., & Atkinson, G. (2007). The ecological validity of laboratory cycling: Does body size explain the dif- ference between laboratory-and field-based cycling performance? Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 3-9.
  5. [34]34. Milner, A.D., & Goodale, M.A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford Uni- versity Press.
  6. [44]44. Rogers, W.A. (2008). Editorial. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 14, 1-4.
  7. [50]50. Van der Kamp, J., Rivas, F., van Doorn, H., & Savelsbergh, G. (2008). Ventral and dorsal contributions in visual anticipation in fast ball sports. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 39, 100-130.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pinder, R. A., Davids, K., Renshaw, I., & Araújo, D.
Affiliations
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (PT)
Venue
Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Published
2011-02
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
146-155
ISSN
  • 0895-2779 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2904
OpenAlex
W1608609560
Cited by
692
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 96 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 15
FWCI
37.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (submittedVersion)
  • USC Research Bank (University of the Sunshine Coast) (submittedVersion)
  • Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
representative design, Brunswik, ecological validity, constraints-led approach, motor learning, nonlinear pedagogy, experimental design, training environment, sport psychology
MeSH terms
Ecology, Humans, Learning, Physical Education and Training, Research Design, Sports, Behavioral Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review