Attention and expectation in human predictive learning: The role of uncertainty
Open accessAbstract
Three localized, visual pattern stimuli were trained as predictive signals of auditory outcomes. One signal partially predicted an aversive noise in Experiment 1 and a neutral tone in Experiment 2, whereas the other signals consistently predicted either the occurrence or absence of the noise. The expectation of the noise was measured during each signal presentation, and only participants for whom this expectation demonstrated contingency knowledge showed differential attention to the signals. Importantly, when attention was measured by visual fixations, the contingency-aware group attended more to the partially predictive signal than to the consistent predictors in both experiments. This profile of visual attention supports the Pearce and Hall (1980) theory of the role of attention in associative learning.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A visual cue with an uncertain 50% relation to an outcome maintains orienting behavior, whereas a cue with a perfect 100% relation to an outcome does not.
“The results of experiments in rats (e.g., Kaye & Pearce, 1984; Wilson et al., 1992) and humans (Hogarth et al., 2008) suggest that a visual cue that has an uncertain (50%) relation to an outcome maintains orienting behavior, whereas a cue that has a perfect (100%) relation to an outcome does not.”
From Context, attention, and the switch between habit and goal-direction in behavior (2021) · cites this paper as Hogarth et al., 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 97
- Authors
- Hogarth, L., Dickinson, A., Austin, A., Brown, C., & Duka, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hogarth, Lee
- Duka, Theodora
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1658-1668
- ISSN
- 0033-555X (ISSN-L)
- 1747-0218
- 1747-0226
- OpenAlex
- W2000160140
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/B/09384)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- predictive learning, attention, expectations, uncertainty, associative learning, visual fixation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Awareness, Discrimination Learning, Female, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Time Factors, Visual Acuity, Intention, Uncertainty, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review