Cited by 53

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Short article: Why mix-ups don't happen in the nursery: Evidence for an experience-based interpretation of the other-age effect

Cassia, Viola Macchi, Picozzi, Marta, Kuefner, Dana, Casati, Monica·2009·Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Abstract

Adults’ face recognition abilities vary across face types, as evidenced by the other-race and other-species effects. Recent evidence shows that face age is another dimension affecting adults’ performance in face recognition tasks, giving rise to an other-age effect (OAE). By comparing recognition performance for adult and newborn faces in a group of maternity-ward nurses and a control group of novice participants, the current study provides evidence for an experience-based interpretation of the OAE. Novice participants were better at recognizing adult than newborn faces and showed an inversion effect for adult faces. Nurses manifested an inversion cost of equal magnitude for both adult and newborn faces and a smaller OAE in comparison to the novices. The results indicate that experience acquired exclusively in adulthood is capable of modulating the OAE and suggest that the visual processes involved in face recognition are still plastic in adulthood, granted that extensive experience with multiple faces is acquired.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17470210802617654

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experience with infants may result in improved infant face recognition.

    “While previous research suggests that experience with infants may result in improved infant face recognition (Cassia et al., 2009)”

    From Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children (2018) · cites this paper as Cassia et al., 2009

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Anastasi J. S., 2006, North American Journal of Psychology, 8, 237
  2. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01679.x · DOI
  3. 10.1080/14640749508401421 · DOI
  4. 10.1037/0096-3445.115.2.107 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.04.006 · DOI
  6. 10.3758/BF03329829 · DOI
  7. 10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.811 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/13506280802396507 · DOI
  9. 10.3758/BF03193209 · DOI
  10. Levin D. T., 2000, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1316
  11. 10.3758/BF03212392 · DOI
  12. 10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.3 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01806.x · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.0406627102 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.003 · DOI
  16. Sangrigoli S., 2005, Psychological Science, 16, 440, 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01554.x · DOI
  17. 10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.36 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.011 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/14640749208401305 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.06.007 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cassia, V. M., Picozzi, M., Kuefner, D., & Casati, M.
Affiliations
University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
Venue
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2009-06
Volume
62
Issue
6
Pages
1099-1107
ISSN
  • 1747-0218
  • 1747-0226
Cited by
53
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review