The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Short article: Why mix-ups don't happen in the nursery: Evidence for an experience-based interpretation of the other-age effect
Abstract
Adults’ face recognition abilities vary across face types, as evidenced by the other-race and other-species effects. Recent evidence shows that face age is another dimension affecting adults’ performance in face recognition tasks, giving rise to an other-age effect (OAE). By comparing recognition performance for adult and newborn faces in a group of maternity-ward nurses and a control group of novice participants, the current study provides evidence for an experience-based interpretation of the OAE. Novice participants were better at recognizing adult than newborn faces and showed an inversion effect for adult faces. Nurses manifested an inversion cost of equal magnitude for both adult and newborn faces and a smaller OAE in comparison to the novices. The results indicate that experience acquired exclusively in adulthood is capable of modulating the OAE and suggest that the visual processes involved in face recognition are still plastic in adulthood, granted that extensive experience with multiple faces is acquired.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Experience with infants may result in improved infant face recognition.
“While previous research suggests that experience with infants may result in improved infant face recognition (Cassia et al., 2009)”
From Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children (2018) · cites this paper as Cassia et al., 2009
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Anastasi J. S., 2006, North American Journal of Psychology, 8, 237
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01679.x · DOI
- 10.1080/14640749508401421 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-3445.115.2.107 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.04.006 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03329829 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.811 · DOI
- 10.1080/13506280802396507 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03193209 · DOI
- Levin D. T., 2000, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1316
- 10.3758/BF03212392 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01806.x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0406627102 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.003 · DOI
- Sangrigoli S., 2005, Psychological Science, 16, 440, 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01554.x · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.36 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.011 · DOI
- 10.1080/14640749208401305 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.06.007 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children
Kramer, R. S. S., Mulgrew, J., & Reynolds, M. G. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.5010 · Cited by 15
A test of age bias in children and adults in prospective person memory
Moore, K. N., Hanan, R. L., & Gaona, K. (2024) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4140
Metadata
- Authors
- Cassia, V. M., Picozzi, M., Kuefner, D., & Casati, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1099-1107
- ISSN
- 1747-0218
- 1747-0226
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review