Cited by 30

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The importance of internal facial features in learning new faces

Longmore, Christopher A., Liu, Chang Hong, Young, Andrew W.·2015·Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Abstract

For familiar faces, the internal features (eyes, nose, and mouth) are known to be differentially salient for recognition compared to external features such as hairstyle. Two experiments are reported that investigate how this internal feature advantage accrues as a face becomes familiar. In Experiment 1, we tested the contribution of internal and external features to the ability to generalize from a single studied photograph to different views of the same face. A recognition advantage for the internal features over the external features was found after a change of viewpoint, whereas there was no internal feature advantage when the same image was used at study and test. In Experiment 2, we removed the most salient external feature (hairstyle) from studied photographs and looked at how this affected generalization to a novel viewpoint. Removing the hair from images of the face assisted generalization to novel viewpoints, and this was especially the case when photographs showing more than one viewpoint were studied. The results suggest that the internal features play an important role in the generalization between different images of an individual's face by enabling the viewer to detect the common identity-diagnostic elements across non-identical instances of the face.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17470218.2014.939666

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.3758/BF03192707 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/13506280244000168 · DOI
  3. BrajeW. L., KerstenD., TarrM. J. & TrojeN. F. (1998). Illumination effects in face recognition. Psychobiology, 26(4), 371–380. WOS:000078391900008 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01795.x · DOI
  5. BruceV. (1994). Stability from variation: The case of face recognition the M.D. Vernon memorial lecture. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 47(1), 5–28. WOS:A1994MY82900002 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/1076-898X.7.3.207 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1080/17470218.2013.800125 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/1467-9280.00144 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1068/p3335 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/13506280444000021 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/09541440340000439 · DOI
  12. 10.20982/tqmp.01.1.p042 · DOI
  13. 10.1068/p080431 · DOI
  14. Endo M., 1984, Tohoku Psychologica Folia, 43, 23
  15. Galton F., 1833, Inquiries into human faculty and its development
  16. 10.1037/0096-1523.22.4.986 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.001 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/09658210902976969 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199706)11:3<211::AID-ACP430>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
  20. 10.1037//0096-1523.11.6.726 · DOI
  21. 10.1037/0021-9010.66.5.651 · DOI
  22. 10.1068/p271107 · DOI
  23. 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.77 · DOI
  24. 10.20982/tqmp.04.2.p061 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/13506280701238073 · DOI
  26. Shepherd J., 1981, Perceiving and remembering faces, 105
  27. SimT., BakerS. & BsatM. (2002, May). The CMU Pose, Illumination, and Expression (PIE) database . Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 46–51. WOS:000176289900008
  28. 10.1348/026151006X159112 · DOI
  29. 10.1068/p140737 · DOI
  30. 10.1007/BF00309318 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Longmore, C. A., Liu, C. H., & Young, A. W.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
  • Department of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK
  • Department of Psychology, University of York, York, UK
Venue
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2015-02
Volume
68
Issue
2
Pages
249-260
ISSN
  • 1747-0218
  • 1747-0226
Cited by
30
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review