The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The importance of internal facial features in learning new faces
Abstract
For familiar faces, the internal features (eyes, nose, and mouth) are known to be differentially salient for recognition compared to external features such as hairstyle. Two experiments are reported that investigate how this internal feature advantage accrues as a face becomes familiar. In Experiment 1, we tested the contribution of internal and external features to the ability to generalize from a single studied photograph to different views of the same face. A recognition advantage for the internal features over the external features was found after a change of viewpoint, whereas there was no internal feature advantage when the same image was used at study and test. In Experiment 2, we removed the most salient external feature (hairstyle) from studied photographs and looked at how this affected generalization to a novel viewpoint. Removing the hair from images of the face assisted generalization to novel viewpoints, and this was especially the case when photographs showing more than one viewpoint were studied. The results suggest that the internal features play an important role in the generalization between different images of an individual's face by enabling the viewer to detect the common identity-diagnostic elements across non-identical instances of the face.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The shape and configuration of internal facial features (eyes, nose, and mouth) are crucial criteria in facial recognition.
“The shape and configuration of internal facial features (i.e. the eyes, nose and mouth) are crucial criteria in facial recognition [62].”
From Simulation of facial growth based on longitudinal data: Age progression and age regression between 7 and 17 years of age using 3D surface data (2019) · cites this paper as [62]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- 10.3758/BF03192707 · DOI
- 10.1080/13506280244000168 · DOI
- BrajeW. L., KerstenD., TarrM. J. & TrojeN. F. (1998). Illumination effects in face recognition. Psychobiology, 26(4), 371–380. WOS:000078391900008 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01795.x · DOI
- BruceV. (1994). Stability from variation: The case of face recognition the M.D. Vernon memorial lecture. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 47(1), 5–28. WOS:A1994MY82900002 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-898X.7.3.207 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/17470218.2013.800125 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9280.00144 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1068/p3335 · DOI
- 10.1080/13506280444000021 · DOI
- 10.1080/09541440340000439 · DOI
- 10.20982/tqmp.01.1.p042 · DOI
- 10.1068/p080431 · DOI
- Endo M., 1984, Tohoku Psychologica Folia, 43, 23
- Galton F., 1833, Inquiries into human faculty and its development
- 10.1037/0096-1523.22.4.986 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.001 · DOI
- 10.1080/09658210902976969 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199706)11:3<211::AID-ACP430>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
- 10.1037//0096-1523.11.6.726 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.66.5.651 · DOI
- 10.1068/p271107 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.77 · DOI
- 10.20982/tqmp.04.2.p061 · DOI
- 10.1080/13506280701238073 · DOI
- Shepherd J., 1981, Perceiving and remembering faces, 105
- SimT., BakerS. & BsatM. (2002, May). The CMU Pose, Illumination, and Expression (PIE) database . Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 46–51. WOS:000176289900008
- 10.1348/026151006X159112 · DOI
- 10.1068/p140737 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00309318 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Koudelová, J., Hoffmannová, E., Dupej, J., & Velemínská, J. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212618 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Longmore, C. A., Liu, C. H., & Young, A. W.
- Affiliations
- Department of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
- Department of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK
- Department of Psychology, University of York, York, UK
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-02
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 249-260
- ISSN
- 1747-0218
- 1747-0226
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review