Cited by 45Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFace Recognition and PerceptionVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Negative mood disrupts self- and reward-biases in perceptual matching

Open access
Sui, Jie, Ohrling, Erik, Humphreys, Glyn W.·2016·Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Abstract

There are established effects of self- and reward-biases even on simple perceptual matching tasks [Sui, J., He, X., & Humphreys, G. W. (2012). Perceptual effects of social salience: Evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1105–1117]; however we know little about whether these biases can be modulated by particular interventions, and whether the biases then change in the same way. Here we assessed how the biases alter under conditions designed to induce negative mood. We had participants read a list of self-related negative or neutral mood statements [Velten, E. (1968). A laboratory task for induction of mood states. Behavior Research and Therapy, 6, 473–482] and also listen for 10 min to a passage of negative or neutral music, prior to carrying out perceptual matching with shapes associated to personal labels (self or stranger) or reward (£12 or £1). Responses to the self- and high-reward-associated shapes were selectively slower and less sensitive ( d′) following the negative mood induction procedures, and the decrease in mood correlated with decreases in the reaction time bias across “high saliency” (self and high-reward) stimuli. We suggest that negative mood may decrease self- and reward-biases through reducing attention to salient external stimuli.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17470218.2015.1122069

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To experimentally manipulate mood, participants can be given the task of reading aloud negative self-deprecating statements about themselves.

    “Для экспериментальной манипуляции настроением участников можно дать им задание зачитать вслух негативные уничижительные утверждения о самих себе.”

    From Когнитивные механизмы дисфункционального принятия решений при психических расстройствах (2025) · cites this paper as Sui et al., 2016

    The Experimental Study’s Method says participants received negative Velten statements as part of a mood-induction procedure, and the Results report that the procedure made mood more negative. The Abstract says participants read self-related negative statements, but our copy does not say they read them aloud or establish that the statements were self-deprecating. The procedure also included music. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Reading aloud negative self-deprecating statements about themselves leads to reduced reward sensitivity in healthy people for subsequent tasks.

    “Несмотря на полное отсутствие контекста, это приведет к снижению у здоровых людей чувствительности к наградам за выполнение последующих задач (Sui et al., 2016).”

    From Когнитивные механизмы дисфункционального принятия решений при психических расстройствах (2025) · cites this paper as Sui et al., 2016

    The Abstract and Experimental Study Discussion report reduced sensitivity to high-reward-associated shapes in a subsequent perceptual-matching task after negative mood induction. But the Method says the induction combined negative self-related statements with music; it does not establish that reading the statements aloud, on its own, caused the effect. The finding concerns reward bias in that specific task, not reward sensitivity across subsequent tasks generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Anderson BA Laurent PA Yantis S Value-driven attentional capture Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2011 108 10367 10371 21646524 PMC3121816
  2. Chiew KS Braver TS Positive affect versus reward: emotional and motivational influences on cognitive control Frontiers in Psychology 2011 2 279 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00279 22022318 PMC3196882 · DOI
  3. Cunningham SJ Brady-Van den Bos M Turk DJ Exploring the effects of ownership and choice on self-memory biases Memory 2011 19 449 461 21864211
  4. Cunningham SJ Turk DJ Macdonald LM Macrae CN Yours or mine? Ownership and memory Consciousness and Cognition 2008 17 312 318 17543540
  5. Decety J Sommerville JA Shared representations between self and other: A social cognitive neuroscience view Trends in Cognitive Science 2003 7 527 533 14643368
  6. Eshel N Roiser JP Reward and punishment processing in depression Biological Psychiatry 2010 68 118 124 20303067
  7. Grimm S Ernst J Boesiger P Schuepbach D Hell D Boeker H Northoff G Increased self-focus in major depressive disorder is related to neural abnormalities in subcortical-cortical midline structures Human Brain Mapping 2009 30 2617 2627 19117277 PMC6870821
  8. Herbert C Pauli P Herbert BM Self-reference modulates the processing of emotional stimuli in the absence of explicit self-referential appraisal instructions Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2011 6 653 661 20855295 PMC3190208
  9. Hervás G Vázquez C Low spirits keep rewards subdued: Decreases in sensitivity to reward and vulnerability to dysphoria Behavior Therapy 2013 44 62 74 23312427
  10. Holm S A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 1979 6 65 70
  11. Lakens D Polarity correspondence in metaphor congruency effects: Structural overlap predicts categorization times for bipolar concepts presented in vertical space Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2012 38 726 736 21843022
  12. Ma Y Han S Why respond faster to the self than others? An implicit positive association theory of self advantage during implicit face recognition Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2010 36 619 633 20515192
  13. Miller J Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals Cognitive Psychology 1982 14 247 279 7083803
  14. Mordkoff JT Danek RH Dividing attention between color and shape revisited: Redundant targets coactivate only when parts of the same perceptual object Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 2011 73 103 112 21258912
  15. Northoff G Hayes DJ Is our self nothing but reward? Biological Psychiatry 2011 69 1019 1025 21276963
  16. Padmala S Pessoa L Motivation versus aversive processing during perception Emotion 2014 14 450 454 24708503 PMC4110899
  17. Paulus MP Decision-making dysfunctions in psychiatry—altered homeostatic processing? Science 2007 318 602 606 17962553
  18. Pignatiello MF Camp CJ Rasar LA Music mood induction: An alternative to the Velten technique Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1986 94 51 63 3745653
  19. Pyszczynksi T Hamilton J Herring F Greenberg J Depression self-focused attention and the negative memory bias Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989 57 351 357
  20. Salovey P Mood-induced self-focused attention Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1992 62 699 707 1583593
  21. Samson D Apperly IA Chiavarino C Humphreys GW Left temporoparietal junction is necessary for representing someone else’s belief Nature Neuroscience 2004 7 499 500 15077111
  22. Soto D Funes MJ Guzman-Garcia A Warbrick T Rotshtein P Humphreys GW Pleasant music overcomes the loss of awareness in patients with visual neglect Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009 106 6011 6016 19307566 PMC2667081
  23. Sui J He X Humphreys GW Perceptual effects of social salience: Evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance 2012 38 1105 1117 22963229
  24. Sui J Liu M Mevorach C Humphreys GW The salient self: The left intra-parietal sulcus responds to social as well as perceptual-salience after self-association Cerebral Cortex 2013a 25 1060 1068 24165832
  25. Sui J Rotshtein P Humphreys GW Coupling social attention to the self forms a network for personal significance Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2013b 110 7607 7612 23610386 PMC3651422
  26. Sui J Yankouskaya A Humphreys GW Super-capacity and violations of race independence for self- but not for reward-associated stimuli Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance 2015 41 441 452 25602970
  27. Townsend JT Eidels A Workload capacity spaces: A unified methodology for response time measures of efficiency as workload is varied Psychon Bulletin & Review 2011 18 659 681 21607804
  28. Uddin LQ Lacoboni M Lange C Keenan JP The self and social cognition: The role of cortical midline structures and mirror neurons Trends in Cognitive Science 2007 11 153 157 10.1016/j.tics.2007.01.001 17300981 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Velten E A laboratory task for induction of mood states Behavior Research and Therapy 1968 6 473 482 5714990
  30. Wang H Humphreys GW Sui J Expanding and retracting from the self: Gains and costs in switching self-associations Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2016 42 247 256 26348068 PMC4730907
  31. Westermann R Spies K Stahl G Hesse FW Relative effectiveness and validity of mood induction procedures: A meta-analysis European Journal of Social Psychology 1996 26 557 580

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sui, J., Ohrling, E., & Humphreys, G. W.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Sui, Jie
Venue
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2016-07
Volume
69
Issue
7
Pages
1438-1448
ISSN
  • 0033-555X (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-0218
  • 1747-0226
OpenAlex
W2302453375
Cited by
45
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • The Wellcome Trust (WT106164MA)
  • the European Research Council (Pepe Grant 323883)
  • from the Economic and Social Research Council, UK (ES/J001597/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
negative mood, mood induction, self-bias, reward bias, perceptual matching, attentional bias, reaction time, attentional salience, emotion and perception
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Female, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Reward, Self Concept, Bias, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review