Social approach to pain in laboratory mice
Abstract
It has been recently demonstrated that pain behavior in the mouse can be modulated by the presence of a conspecific, but what remains unclear is whether such pain behavior can serve the function of soliciting social approach. Using a novel social approach paradigm, we tested mice in various dyadic or triadic conditions, including "jailed" mice-some in pain via intraperitoneal injection of 0.9% acetic acid-and test mice free to approach or avoid the jailed mice. We observed a sex-specific effect whereby female, but not male, test mice approached a familiar same-sex conspecific in pain more frequently than an unaffected familiar or unfamiliar, but affected, conspecific. Despite a substantial literature emphasizing oxytocin's role in affiliative and pair-bonding behavior, this effect was also observed in female mice lacking the oxytocin receptor, suggesting that pain-related social approach may not be mediated by oxytocin. Furthermore, we found that the frequency of contact by the test mouse was negatively correlated with the pain behavior of the jailed mouse, suggesting that proximity of a familiar unaffected conspecific may have analgesic properties.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are examples of prosocial responses to stressed conspecifics in both voles and mice.
“and there are examples of prosocial responses to stressed conspecifics in both voles21 and mice41.”
From Insular cortex mediates approach and avoidance responses to social affective stimuli (2018) · cites this paper as [41]
Previous research has provided clear evidence that rodents experience emotional contagion.
“Previous research has provided clear evidence that rodents experience emotional contagion (5, 10, 11, 17–19)”
From Empathy and pro-social behavior in rats (2011) · cites this paper as [5]
Human and non-human females are more empathic than males.
“Consistent with previous findings that human and non-human females are more empathic than males (5–7)”
From Empathy and pro-social behavior in rats (2011) · cites this paper as [5]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 138
- Authors
- Langford, D. J., Tuttle, A. H., Brown, K., Deschenes, S., Fischer, D. B., Mutso, A., Root, K. C., Sotocinal, S. G., Stern, M. A., Mogil, J. S., & Sternberg, W. F.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- Haverford College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sternberg, Wendy F.
- Venue
- Social Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 163-170
- ISSN
- 1747-0919 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-0927
- OpenAlex
- W2112250788
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Keywords
- pain behavior, social approach, acetic acid-induced pain, sex differences, oxytocin, analgesia, affiliative behavior, mice
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Animals, Constriction, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Pain, Sex Factors, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Receptors, Oxytocin, Mice, Knockout, Acetic Acid, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review