Raising Multicultural Children in Japan: A Mixed Methods Examination of Parent-Child-Society Dynamics
Abstract
This paper examined the experiences of parents raising multicultural children in Japan by obtaining quantitative and qualitative data via an online questionnaire from 158 parents raising multicultural children in Japan. Our findings suggested that society, children, and parents influenced each other in an inextricable manner. While we found variables that differentiated the respondents’ experiences (e.g. children’s appearances, names, and personalities; and parents’ place of origin, language competence, gender, and attitudes), we also found common threads in their experiences (e.g. being “othered,” pressures to conform, language barriers, cultural differences, and benefits). Many wished for a more open and accepting society.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Foreign-born spouses tend to have difficulties obtaining educational resources to teach their heritage culture and language to their children.
“They also tend to have difficulties in obtaining educational resources to teach their heritage culture and language to their children (Kuramoto et al., 2017).”
From Parenting Stress and Social Support among Cross-national and Traditional Families (2017) · cites this paper as Kuramoto et al., 2017
Foreign-born spouses with children reported difficulties communicating with teachers, helping with homework, and getting involved in school activities.
“Further, foreign-born spouses with children reported difficulties communicating with teachers, helping with homework, and getting involved in school activities (Kuramoto et al., 2017).”
From Parenting Stress and Social Support among Cross-national and Traditional Families (2017) · cites this paper as Kuramoto et al., 2017
In Japan, children with mixed appearance and heritage were targeted in school.
“In Japan, for example, children with mixed appearance and heritage were being targeted in school (Kuramoto et al., 2017).”
From Parenting Stress and Social Support among Cross-national and Traditional Families (2017) · cites this paper as Kuramoto et al., 2017
Cites
The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674028845 · Cited by 26,084 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parenting Stress and Social Support among Cross-national and Traditional Families
Xiang, Y., Hoot, J., & Raisor, J. (2017) · Journal of Family Diversity in Education · doi:10.53956/jfde.2017.103 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kuramoto, M., Koide, T., Yoshida, T., & Ogawa, E.
- Affiliations
- Aoyama Gakuin University (JP)
- Tsuda University (JP)
- Keio University (JP)
- Reitaku University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Yoshida, Tomoko
- Venue
- Journal of Intercultural Communication Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-07-04
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 360-384
- ISSN
- 1747-5759 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-5767
- OpenAlex
- W2737961349
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 4.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Intercultural Communication Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
- Keywords
- multicultural children, parenting, parental experiences, othering, language barriers, cultural differences, social acceptance, conformity pressure, intercultural families, Japan
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review