Cited by 29Disaster Management and ResilienceLandslides and related hazardsEarthquake and Disaster Impact Studies

Spatial and temporal analysis of natural hazard mortality in Nepal

Aksha, Sanam K., Juran, Luke, Resler, Lynn M.·2018·Environmental Hazards

Abstract

The impacts of natural hazards are typically measured in terms of loss of human lives and economic damage, and recent studies demonstrate that deaths attributed to natural hazards have increased. Using the publicly available DesInventar database, we examined spatial and temporal patterns of natural hazard mortality from 1971 to 2011 at the district and village levels of Nepal and identified natural hazards that contributed most to mortality. Spatial clusters of mortality at the district and village levels were detected using local and global spatial autocorrelation measures (Moran's I). Landslides (41.91%) and floods (32.52%) accounted for approximately three quarters of natural hazard mortalities over the study period. A Global Moran's I test positively confirmed clustering at both the district (0.199, p < .001) and village (0.256, p < .001) levels, whereas a Local Moran's I test further detected clustering in the central and terai regions, where dynamic geologic and geomorphic processes combined with human-environment interaction constitute major risk factors. A better understanding of multihazard mortality patterns across geographic landscapes and time has the potential to aid policy makers, planners, and local officers to more efficiently allocate scarce capital and human resources to reduce mortality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17477891.2017.1398630

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In mountainous regions, landslides and other impacts of intensive rainfall are often the major cause of climate-related loss of life and damage to property.

    “In mountainous regions, landslides and other impacts of intensive rainfall are often the major cause of climate-related loss of life and damage to property (90).”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [90]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aksha, S. K., Juran, L., & Resler, L. M.
Affiliations
Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Aksha, Sanam K.
Venue
Environmental Hazards
Published
2017-11-09
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
163-179
ISSN
  • 1464-2867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-7891
  • 1878-0059
OpenAlex
W2767935098
Cited by
29
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
6.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Environmental Hazards (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Landslides and related hazards
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
Keywords
spatial clustering, temporal patterns, landslides, floods, multi-hazard risk, spatial autocorrelation, district-level mortality, Terai region, Nepal, disaster risk reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review