Grading and mechanical characterization of small-diameter round chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) timber from thinning operations
Abstract
In forestry, thinning operations result in the extraction of young trees with small dimensions. The evaluation of the potential end use of these small-diameter logs (currently mainly used as poles or fence posts) for added-value products such as structural timber is of considerable economic and industrial interests. In the present work, 216 pieces of small-diameter logs of chestnut timber obtained from thinning operations were evaluated in order to determine their mechanical properties and assess various visual or non-destructive grading systems. The two visual standards evaluated (EN 1927 and DIN 4074) were ineffective in grading according to mechanical properties. On the other hand, a grading system based on a non-destructive measurement (acoustic wave velocity) resulted in better classification by structural quality. The characteristic values of the small-diameter round chestnut timber, determined according to the standards EN 384 and EN 338, achieved similar values as standard rectangular sawn timber with respect to modulus of elasticity and density, and higher values for bending strength.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Non-destructive testing techniques are commonly used to estimate the mechanical properties of standing trees, logs, sawn timber and to evaluate existing timber structures.
“Non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques are commonly used to estimate the mechanical properties of standing trees, logs, sawn timber and to evaluate existing timber structures [25 -32].”
From Grading of recovered Norway spruce (Picea abies) timber for structural purposes (2023) · cites this paper as [26]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Grading of recovered Norway spruce (Picea abies) timber for structural purposes
Llana, D. F., Íñiguez-González, G., Plos, M., & Turk, G. (2023) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132440 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vega, A., González, L., Fernández, I., & González, P.
- Affiliations
- Centro Tecnológico Forestal y de la Madera de Asturias (CETEMAS), Carbayín, Spain
- Corresponding author
- Vega, Abel
- ORCID
- González, Laura
- Venue
- Wood Material Science & Engineering
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-10-16
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 81-87
- ISSN
- 1748-0272 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-0280
- OpenAlex
- W2766152412
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Wood Material Science and Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation of the Principality of Asturias
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Bamboo properties and applications
- Keywords
- Castanea sativa, small-diameter logs, thinning, timber grading, acoustic wave velocity, wood mechanical properties, elastic modulus, flexural strength, wood density, structural timber
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review