Cited by 41CO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesConcrete and Cement Materials Research

Experimental mineral carbonation: approaches to accelerate CO2sequestration in mine waste materials

Jacobs, A.D., Hitch, M.·2011·International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment

Abstract

The ability to sequester CO2 under elevated temperature and pressure has been shown to be successful using MgO-rich rocks. This is achieved by mineral carbonation. Two predominant sources of substrate material are considered, namely ultramafic mine waste rock and process tailings. Each material has specific sequestration potential benefits for select mining operations to source additional revenue from the offset of anthropogenic carbon and sales of carbonate industrial products. Laboratory scale tests can determine the CO2 fixation capacity of the proposed rocks; however, a more practical repeatable method of determining thecarbonation potential is needed. Data generation from autoclave testing of applicable mining waste material facilitates the understanding of carbonation determining parameters. The development of a sequestration potential algorithm that can be applied to drill hole geochemical data is preferred. The generation of non-destructive sequestration potential values from geostatistical interpretation will facilitate their inclusion into applicable mining block models and the determination of bulk carbon sequestration capacity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17480930.2011.608883

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ultramafic rock-hosted ore deposits favored for integrated mineral carbonation technologies include chrysotile, nickel, chromium, diamond, and platinum group element mines.

    “The ultramafic rock-hosted ore deposits that are favored for integrated mineral carbonation technologies include chrysotile [63], nickel [64-66], chromium [67,68], diamond [69] and platinum group element (PGE) mines [70,71].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacobs, A. D., & Hitch, M.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Jacobs, A.D.
Venue
International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment
Published
2011-12
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
321-331
ISSN
  • 1748-0930 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-0949
OpenAlex
W2065210248
Cited by
41
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Mining Reclamation and Environment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Keywords
CO2 mineralization, CO2 sequestration, waste rock, ultramafic rocks, autoclave testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review