Experimental mineral carbonation: approaches to accelerate CO2sequestration in mine waste materials
Abstract
The ability to sequester CO2 under elevated temperature and pressure has been shown to be successful using MgO-rich rocks. This is achieved by mineral carbonation. Two predominant sources of substrate material are considered, namely ultramafic mine waste rock and process tailings. Each material has specific sequestration potential benefits for select mining operations to source additional revenue from the offset of anthropogenic carbon and sales of carbonate industrial products. Laboratory scale tests can determine the CO2 fixation capacity of the proposed rocks; however, a more practical repeatable method of determining thecarbonation potential is needed. Data generation from autoclave testing of applicable mining waste material facilitates the understanding of carbonation determining parameters. The development of a sequestration potential algorithm that can be applied to drill hole geochemical data is preferred. The generation of non-destructive sequestration potential values from geostatistical interpretation will facilitate their inclusion into applicable mining block models and the determination of bulk carbon sequestration capacity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ultramafic rock-hosted ore deposits favored for integrated mineral carbonation technologies include chrysotile, nickel, chromium, diamond, and platinum group element mines.
“The ultramafic rock-hosted ore deposits that are favored for integrated mineral carbonation technologies include chrysotile [63], nickel [64-66], chromium [67,68], diamond [69] and platinum group element (PGE) mines [70,71].”
From Integrated Mineral Carbonation of Ultramafic Mine Deposits—A Review (2018) · cites this paper as [65]
Cites
CO2 disposal by means of silicates
SEIFRITZ, W. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/345486b0 · Cited by 956 · see citing works
Wilson, S. A. (2006) · American Mineralogist · doi:10.2138/am.2006.2058 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Aqueous Carbonation of Natural Brucite: Relevance to CO<sub>2</sub> Sequestration
Zhao, L., Sang, L., Chen, J., Ji, J., & Teng, H. H. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es9017656 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mineralization of carbon dioxide: A literature review
Romanov, V., Soong, Y., Carney, C., Rush, G. E., Nielsen, B., & O'Connor, W. (2015) · ChemBioEng Reviews · doi:10.1002/cben.201500002 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Recent developments and challenges of aqueous mineral carbonation: a review
Veetil, S. P., & Hitch, M. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-020-02776-z · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Self-citationIntegrated Mineral Carbonation of Ultramafic Mine Deposits—A Review
Li, J., Hitch, M., Power, I., & Pan, Y. (2018) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min8040147 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Self-citationChrysotile dissolution rates: Implications for carbon sequestration
Thom, J. G. M., Dipple, G. M., Power, I. M., & Harrison, A. L. (2013) · Applied Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.04.016 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jacobs, A. D., & Hitch, M.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Jacobs, A.D.
- ORCID
- Hitch, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 321-331
- ISSN
- 1748-0930 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-0949
- OpenAlex
- W2065210248
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Mining Reclamation and Environment (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
- Keywords
- CO2 mineralization, CO2 sequestration, waste rock, ultramafic rocks, autoclave testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review