The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
3D-printed upper limb prostheses: a review
Open accessAbstract
GOAL: This paper aims to provide an overview with quantitative information of existing 3D-printed upper limb prostheses. We will identify the benefits and drawbacks of 3D-printed devices to enable improvement of current devices based on the demands of prostheses users. METHODS: A review was performed using Scopus, Web of Science and websites related to 3D-printing. Quantitative information on the mechanical and kinematic specifications and 3D-printing technology used was extracted from the papers and websites. RESULTS: The overview (58 devices) provides the general specifications, the mechanical and kinematic specifications of the devices and information regarding the 3D-printing technology used for hands. The overview shows prostheses for all different upper limb amputation levels with different types of control and a maximum material cost of $500. CONCLUSION: A large range of various prostheses have been 3D-printed, of which the majority are used by children. Evidence with respect to the user acceptance, functionality and durability of the 3D-printed hands is lacking. Contrary to what is often claimed, 3D-printing is not necessarily cheap, e.g., injection moulding can be cheaper. Conversely, 3D-printing provides a promising possibility for individualization, e.g., personalized socket, colour, shape and size, without the need for adjusting the production machine. Implications for rehabilitation Upper limb deficiency is a condition in which a part of the upper limb is missing as a result of a congenital limb deficiency of as a result of an amputation. A prosthetic hand can restore some of the functions of a missing limb and help the user in performing activities of daily living. Using 3D-printing technology is one of the solutions to manufacture hand prostheses. This overview provides information about the general, mechanical and kinematic specifications of all the devices and it provides the information about the 3D-printing technology used to print the hands.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jones, L. A., & Lederman, S. J. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195173154.001.0001 · Cited by 720
Cited by
The FATE Landscape of Sign Language AI Datasets: An Interdisciplinary Perspective
Bragg, D., Caselli, N., Hochgesang, J. A., Huenerfauth, M., Katz-Hernandez, L., Koller, O., Kushalnagar, R., Vogler, C., & Ladner, R. E. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/3436996 · Cited by 55
Sheng, M., Wang, W.-J., Tong, T.-T., Yang, Y.-Y., Chen, H.-L., & Su, B.-Y. (2021) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2021/5631730 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- ten Kate, J., Smit, G., & Breedveld, P.
- Venue
- Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-02-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 300-314
- ISSN
- 1748-3107 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-3115
- OpenAlex
- W2583285699
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 3D-printed upper limb prostheses: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17483107.2016.1253117
- The paper
- ten Kate, J., Smit, G., & Breedveld, P. (2017). 3D-printed upper limb prostheses: a review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2016.1253117
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.