Cited by 7Muscle activation and electromyography studiesProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Motion Intent Recognition in Intelligent Lower Limb Prosthesis Using One‐Dimensional Dual‐Tree Complex Wavelet Transforms

Open access
Sheng, Min, Wang, Wan-Jun, Tong, Ting-Ting, Yang, Yuan-Yuan, Chen, Hui-Lin, Su, Ben-Yue·2021·Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The motion intent recognition via lower limb prosthesis can be regarded as a kind of short‐term action recognition, where the major issue is to explore the gait instantaneous conversion (known as transitional pattern) between each two adjacent different steady states of gait mode. Traditional intent recognition methods usually employ a set of statistical features to classify the transitional patterns. However, the statistical features of the short‐term signals via the instantaneous conversion are empirically unstable, which may degrade the classification accuracy. Bearing this in mind, we introduce the one‐dimensional dual‐tree complex wavelet transform (1D‐DTCWT) to address the motion intent recognition via lower limb prosthesis. On the one hand, the local analysis ability of the wavelet transform can amplify the instantaneous variation characteristics of gait information, making the extracted features of instantaneous pattern between two adjacent different steady states more stable. On the other hand, the translation invariance and direction selectivity of 1D‐DTCWT can help to explore the continuous features of patterns, which better reflects the inherent continuity of human lower limb movements. In the experiments, we have recruited ten able‐bodied subjects and one amputee subject and collected data by performing five steady states and eight transitional states. The experimental results show that the recognition accuracy of the able‐bodied subjects has reached 98.91%, 98.92%, and 97.27% for the steady states, transitional states, and total motion states, respectively. Furthermore, the accuracy of the amputee has reached 100%, 91.16%, and 90.27% for the steady states, transitional states, and total motion states, respectively. The above evidence finally indicates that the proposed method can better explore the gait instantaneous conversion (better expressed as motion intent) between each two adjacent different steady states compared with the state‐of‐the‐art.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2021/5631730

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Sheng M. Liu S. Su B. Motion intent recognition of intelligent lower limb prosthesis based on GMM-HMM Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument 2019 40 5 169 178

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheng, M., Wang, W.-J., Tong, T.-T., Yang, Y.-Y., Chen, H.-L., & Su, B.-Y.
Affiliations
Anqing Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Hui-Lin
Venue
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-01
Volume
2021
Issue
1
Pages
5631730-5631730
ISSN
  • 1687-5265 (ISSN-L)
  • 1687-5273
OpenAlex
W4226143558
Cited by
7
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Nature (61603003)
  • Anhui Provincial Department of Education (gxbjZD26)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
lower limb prosthesis, dual-tree complex wavelet transform, gait transition, amputees, gait feature extraction, translation invariance, direction selectivity
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Amputees, Artificial Limbs, Humans, Motion, Wavelet Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review