Cited by 134Higher Education Practises and EngagementCritical and Liberation PedagogyChildren's Rights and Participation

Student voice and the politics of listening in higher education

McLeod, Julie·2011·Critical Studies in Education

Abstract

The promise of giving voice to under-represented and marginalized groups has been a mainstay of emancipatory agendas in educational research. It has been an especially influential focus in feminist and gender equity reform projects and is increasingly a feature of policies and programs directed to enhance youth participation and civic inclusion. Voice typically signals a concern with representation and empowerment and associated claims for transformation have been criticized on several grounds, from offering only superficial forms of inclusion to the problem of power in the selective bestowing of voice. Yet the appeal of voice remains powerful. What can be learnt from feminist and other critical attention to promoting voice in education; and what might be the challenges – limitations and benefits – of adopting a pedagogy and politics of voice as a strategy to promote equity and wider participation in higher education? I outline an argument for how we might re-frame voice as problem not so much of expression and representation, but of listening and recognition, and consider some of the implications of such a reframing for student equity strategies in higher education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17508487.2011.572830

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Student-staff partnerships are considered an equitable or democratic representation of 'citizenship education'.

    “and are therefore considered an equitable or democratic representation of 'citizenship education' (McLeod, 2011).”

    From Assessment design through co-creation (2025) · cites this paper as McLeod, 2011

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McLeod, J.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
McLeod, Julie
Venue
Critical Studies in Education
Published
2011-06
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
179-189
ISSN
  • 0076-6275 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-8487
  • 1750-8495
OpenAlex
W2029208915
Cited by
134
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
20.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Critical Studies in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Critical and Liberation Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
Keywords
student voice, listening, recognition, marginalized students, student equity, higher education, feminist pedagogy, representation, power in education, citizen participation, emancipatory education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review