Cited by 67Geography Education and PedagogyGeography and Education MethodsHistorical Geography and Geographical Thought

A capabilities approach to higher education: Geocapabilities and implications for geography curricula

Open access
Walkington, Helen, Dyer, Sarah, Solem, Michael, Haigh, Martin, Waddington, Shelagh·2018·Journal of Geography in Higher Education

Abstract

A geographical education offers more than skills, subject knowledge and generic attributes. It also develops a set of discipline-specific capabilities that contribute to a graduate’s future learning and experience, granting them special ways of thinking for lifelong development and for contributing to the welfare of themselves, their community and their world. This paper considers the broader purposes and values of disciplinary teaching in contributing to individual human development. Set in the context of recent debates concerning the role of the university and the neo-liberalisation of higher education this paper explores approaches to developing the geography curriculum in ways that re-assert the educational value of geographical thinking for students. Using international examples of teaching and learning practice in geography, we recognise five geocapabilities: use of the geographical imagination; ethical subject-hood with respect to the impacts of geographical processes; integrative thinking about society–environment relationships; spatial thinking; and the structured exploration of places. A capabilities approach offers a productive and resilient response to the threats of pedagogic frailty and increasingly generic learning in higher education. Finally, a framework to stimulate dialogue about curriculum development and the role of geocapabilities in the higher education curriculum is suggested.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03098265.2017.1379060

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walkington, H., Dyer, S., Solem, M., Haigh, M., & Waddington, S.
Affiliations
  • Oxford Brookes University (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • American Association of Geographers (US)
  • National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE)
Corresponding author
Walkington, Helen
Venue
Journal of Geography in Higher Education
Published
2017-09-15
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
7-24
ISSN
  • 0309-8265 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-1845
OpenAlex
W2755939347
Cited by
67
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4
FWCI
28.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Geography in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Radar (Oxford Brookes University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geography Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Geography and Education Methods
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Historical Geography and Geographical Thought
Keywords
capability approach, geography curriculum, higher education, geographical thought, human development, role of universities, geographical imagination, spatial thinking, society-environment relationship, curriculum development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review