Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4Artistic and Creative ResearchCinema and Media StudiesCultural Industries and Urban Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

One for the team: understanding individual and collaborative pursuits of script development across competing discourses

Taylor, Stayci, Batty, Craig·2024·Creative Industries Journal

Abstract

Drawing on interviews from industry professionals, this article explores both the collaborative and, less documented, individual manifestations of script development. Researchers have noted that within screenwriting and screen production, script development practices and processes defy definition over various modes, media, global contexts and production cultures. This article argues that part of this flux is the ways in which individual pursuits of script development are mis/understood and/or dismissed. Screenwriting scholarship often questions the discourses within which individual pursuits of script development are promoted, especially the ‘how-to’ market of screenwriting manuals, using the ‘practical realities’ of the screen industry as a basis for this critique. This article builds on this work to problematise script development as a solely collaborative pursuit. Those interviewed for the research occupy a breadth of script development roles across their respective countries and industries, including screenwriter, script consultant and script editor. While the how-to market often neglects the practical realities of script development by reducing it to the individual pursuit from idea to draft, it is not simply the case that the industrial perspective is always collaborative either, as these professionals reveal. This article investigates the relationship that exists between collaborative practices and the contributions of the individual.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17510694.2022.2065782

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Aristotle. 1905. Aristotle’s Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  2. 10.1007/978-3-030-21744-0_35 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/978-3-030-48713-3_16 · DOI
  4. 10.1386/josc.8.3.225_1 · DOI
  5. Bloore, P. 2013. The Screenplay Business: Managing Creativity and Script Development in the Film Industry. London and New York: Routledge.
  6. 10.1525/9780520932326 · DOI
  7. Campbell, J. 1949. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. New York: Pantheon.
  8. Conor, B. 2013. “Hired Hands, Liars, Schmucks: Histories of Screenwriting Work and Workers in Contemporary Screen Production.” In Theorizing Cultural Work: Transforming Labour in the Cultural and Creative Industries, edited by M. Banks, S. Taylor, and R. Gill, 44–55. London: Routledge.
  9. Girls. 2007–2012. cr. Lena Dunham. USA: HBO.
  10. 10.1386/josc_00012_1 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/978-3-030-48713-3_5 · DOI
  12. 10.1057/9781137338938_15 · DOI
  13. 10.1386/jmpr.5.2.89/0 · DOI
  14. 10.1057/9780230392298 · DOI
  15. Macdonald I. 2021. “Originality and Authorship in the Development of the Screen Idea.” In Script Development: Critical Approaches Creative Practices International Perspectives edited by C. Batty and S. Taylor 9–30. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. · DOI
  16. 10.1007/978-3-030-48713-3_12 · DOI
  17. 10.1386/josc.8.2.177_1 · DOI
  18. Maras S. 2009. Screenwriting: History Theory and Practice. London and New York: Wallflower Press.
  19. McKee, R. 1998. Story: Substance, Structure, Style. New York: Regan Books.
  20. 10.1007/978-3-030-48713-3_3 · DOI
  21. 10.1057/9781137338938_7 · DOI
  22. 10.1386/josc.8.3.319_1 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1386/josc.8.3.267_1 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1007/978-3-030-82234-7_2 · DOI
  25. Snyder, B. 2005. Save the Cat!: The Last Book on Screenwriting That You’ll Ever Need. Studio City: Michael Wiese Productions
  26. 10.1007/978-3-030-82234-7_11 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/17503175.2021.1922162 · DOI
  28. Thompson, K. 1999. Storytelling in the New Hollywood: Understanding Classical Narrative Technique. London: Harvard University Press.
  29. Tieber, C. 2012. “Stories, Conferences and Manuals: The Normative Function of Screenwriting Manuals in the Historical Context.” Theorizing Screenwriting Practice Workshop, Brno, Masaryk University, 22–25 November 2012, 1–6. [Conference Paper]
  30. 10.1007/978-3-030-82234-7_35 · DOI
  31. Vogler, C. 1992. The Writer’s Journey: Mythic Structure for Writers. 1st ed. Studio City: Michael Wiese Productions.
  32. 10.1007/978-3-319-95732-6 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Taylor, S., & Batty, C.
Affiliations
  • RMIT University (AU)
  • University of South Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Stayci
Venue
Creative Industries Journal
Published
2022-05-02
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
157-168
ISSN
  • 1751-0694 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-0708
OpenAlex
W4225276769
Cited by
4
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Creative Industries Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (acceptedVersion)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Artistic and Creative Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cinema and Media Studies
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Keywords
script development, screenwriting, screen industry, collaboration, individual authorship, screenwriting manuals, screenwriters, screen production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review