Cited by 39Sports, Gender, and SocietyLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyPhysical Education and Sports Studies

Transsexuals in Sport–Fairness and Freedom, Regulation and Law

Open access
Coggon, John, Hammond, Natasha, Holm, S⊘ren·2008·Sport, Ethics and Philosophy

Abstract

The question of if, and under what conditions transsexuals should be allowed to participate in sports in their acquired sex is becoming increasingly relevant partly because the number of transsexuals is increasing partly because many countries now provide mechanisms for achieving legal recognition as belonging to the new acquired sex. This paper develops (1) an analysis of the justification for maintaining sex segregation in some sports and (2) an account of the rights of transsexuals to be recognised in their new sex. On the basis of these two analyses it critically evaluates two set of rules for the participation of transsexuals in elite sports: the UK guidelines issued in pursuance of the Gender Recognition Act 2004 and the International Olympic Committee's guidelines. It is argued that these guidelines are conflicting and that a modified set of criteria is more justifiable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17511320801896091

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Segregating sports by biological sex does not account for transgender persons who experience incongruence between their biological sex and their experienced gender identity, and whose legal sex may be different to that recorded at birth.

    “Segregating sports by biological sex does not account for transgender persons who experience incongruence between their biological sex and their experienced gender identity, and whose legal sex may be different to that recorded at birth [6, 7].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Coggon, J., Hammond, N., & Holm, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Holm, S⊘ren
Venue
Sport, Ethics and Philosophy
Published
2008-04
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
4-17
ISSN
  • 1751-1321 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-133X
OpenAlex
W2034899458
Cited by
39
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sport Ethics and Philosophy (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Physical Education and Sports Studies
Keywords
transsexuals, sports participation, sex segregation in sport, fairness, gender classification, Gender Recognition Act 2004, elite sport, gender identity, sports regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review