The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Audience Engagement, Reciprocity, and the Pursuit of Community Connectedness in Public Media Journalism
Abstract
In light of the media industry’s growing focus on audience engagement, this article explores how online and offline forms of engagement unfold within journalism, based on a comparative case study of two American public media newsrooms. This study addresses gaps in the literature by (1) examining what engagement means for public media and (2) applying the concept of reciprocal journalism to evaluate the nature of reciprocity (direct, indirect, or sustained) in the give-and-take between journalists and their communities. Drawing on direct observation and in-depth interviews, this article shows how this emerging focus on engagement is driven by public media journalists’ desire to make their relationship with the public more enduring and mutually beneficial. We find that such journalists privilege offline modes of engagement (e.g., listening sessions and partnerships with local organizations) in hopes of building trust and strengthening ties with their community, more so than digital modes of engagement (e.g., social media) that are more directly tied to news publishing. Moreover, this case study reveals that public media organizations, in and through their engagement efforts, are distinguishing between the communities they cover in their reporting and the audiences they reach with their reporting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Putnam, R. (2000) · doi:10.1145/358916.361990 · Cited by 17,114
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940690600500107 · Cited by 11,829
Knock, Knock . Who's There? The Imagined Audience
Litt, E. (2012) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.705195 · Cited by 629
The Imagined Audience on Social Network Sites
Litt, E., & Hargittai, E. (2016) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305116633482 · Cited by 395
Citizen Journalism: A retrospective on what we know, an agenda for what we don’t
Wall, M. (2015) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2014.1002513 · Cited by 199
Cited by
Online Harassment and Its Implications for the Journalist–Audience Relationship
Lewis, S. C., Zamith, R., & Coddington, M. (2020) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2020.1811743 · Cited by 234
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Belair-Gagnon, V., Nelson, J. L., & Lewis, S. C.
- Venue
- Journalism Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-11-14
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 558-575
- ISSN
- 1751-2786 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-2794
- OpenAlex
- W2901548664
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 34.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Audience Engagement, Reciprocity, and the Pursuit of Community Connectedness in Public Media Journalism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17512786.2018.1542975
- The paper
- Belair-Gagnon, V., Nelson, J. L., & Lewis, S. C. (2019). Audience Engagement, Reciprocity, and the Pursuit of Community Connectedness in Public Media Journalism. Journalism Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2018.1542975
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.