The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Healthcare information systems: data mining methods in the creation of a clinical recommender system
Abstract
Recommender systems have been extensively studied to present items, such as movies, music and books that are likely of interest to the user. Researchers have indicated that integrated medical information systems are becoming an essential part of the modern healthcare systems. Such systems have evolved to an integrated enterprise-wide system. In particular, such systems are considered as a type of enterprise information systems or ERP system addressing healthcare industry sector needs. As part of efforts, nursing care plan recommender systems can provide clinical decision support, nursing education, clinical quality control, and serve as a complement to existing practice guidelines. We propose to use correlations among nursing diagnoses, outcomes and interventions to create a recommender system for constructing nursing care plans. In the current study, we used nursing diagnosis data to develop the methodology. Our system utilises a prefix-tree structure common in itemset mining to construct a ranked list of suggested care plan items based on previously-entered items. Unlike common commercial systems, our system makes sequential recommendations based on user interaction, modifying a ranked list of suggested items at each step in care plan construction. We rank items based on traditional association-rule measures such as support and confidence, as well as a novel measure that anticipates which selections might improve the quality of future rankings. Since the multi-step nature of our recommendations presents problems for traditional evaluation measures, we also present a new evaluation method based on average ranking position and use it to test the effectiveness of different recommendation strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering
Linden, G., Smith, B., & York, J. (2003) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/mic.2003.1167344 · Cited by 5,403
Cited by
A Survey of Recommendation Systems: Recommendation Models, Techniques, and Application Fields
Ko, H., Lee, S., Park, Y., & Choi, A. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11010141 · Cited by 658
Ali, O., Abdelbaki, W., Shrestha, A., Elbasi, E., Alryalat, M. A. A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2023.100333 · Cited by 568
A Systematic Review on Healthcare Analytics: Application and Theoretical Perspective of Data Mining
Islam, M. S., Hasan, M. M., Wang, X., Germack, H. D., & Noor-E-Alam, M. (2018) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare6020054 · Cited by 267
EMG and EPP-integrated human-machine interface between the paralyzed and rehabilitation exoskeleton
Yin, Y. H., Fan, Y. J., & Xu, L. D. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine · doi:10.1109/titb.2011.2178034 · Cited by 197
Distributed data mining: a survey
Zeng, L., Li, L., Duan, L., Lu, K., Shi, Z., Wang, M., Wu, W., & Luo, P. (2012) · Information Technology and Management · doi:10.1007/s10799-012-0124-y · Cited by 85
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Duan, L., Street, W. N., & Xu, E.
- Venue
- Enterprise Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 169-181
- ISSN
- 1751-7575 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7583
- OpenAlex
- W2167657841
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 96.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Healthcare information systems: data mining methods in the creation of a clinical recommender system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17517575.2010.541287
- The paper
- Duan, L., Street, W. N., & Xu, E. (2011). Healthcare information systems: data mining methods in the creation of a clinical recommender system. Enterprise Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2010.541287
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.