The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Banking on AI: mandating a proactive approach to AI regulation in the financial sector
Open accessAbstract
Despite an emerging international consensus on principles of AI governance, lawmakers have so far failed to translate those principles into regulations in the financial sector. Perhaps, in order to remain competitive in the global race for AI supremacy without being typecast as stifling innovation, typically cautious financial regulators are unusually allowing the introduction of experimental AI technology into the financial sector, with few controls on the unprecedented risks to consumers and financial stability. Once an unregulated AI software causes serious economic harm, a public and regulatory backlash would lead to over-regulation that could harm innovation of this potentially beneficial technology. Artificial intelligence is rapidly influencing the financial sector with innumerable potential benefits, such as enhancing financial services and improving regulatory compliance. This article argues that the best way to encourage a sustainable future in AI innovation in the financial sector is to support a proactive regulatory approach prior to any financial harm occurring. This proactive approach should implement rational regulations that embody jurisdiction-specific rules in line with carefully construed international principles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“De acuerdo con Truby et al. (2020), existe un consenso internacional sobre los principios de la gobernanza de la IA, pero los legisladores no han logrado traducir esos principios en regulaciones para el sector financiero.”
From Hacia una normativa sobre la inteligencia artificial (IA): consideraciones clave y regulaciones internacionales (2024) · cites this paper as Truby et al. (2020)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- S Legg and M Hutter, "A Collection of Definitions of Intelli- gence," arXiv, June 15, 2007, https://arxiv.org/pdf/0706. 3639.pdf.
- NJ Nilsson, The Quest for Artificial Intelligence: A History of Ideas and Achievements (Cambridge University Press 2010).
- C Goodhart, P Hartmann, D Llewellyn, L Rojas-Suarez, and S Weisbrod, Financial Regulation: Why, how and where now? 2 (Routledge: 1998). 23 Ibid. 24 CK Whitehead, Reframing Financial Regulation, 90 (Boston Univ. L. Rev. 6 2010) (arguing that financial markets have begun to bypass traditional business categories that largely frame financial regulation due to convergence in the products and services, new market entrants, and a shift in capital-raising and risk-bearing from traditional intermediation to the capital markets);
- J Black, Restructuring Global and EU Financial Regu- lation: Character, Capacities, and Learning 1.06 in E Wymeersch, KJ Hopt, and G Ferrarini (eds.), Financial Regulation and Supervi- sion: A Post-Crisis Analysis (Oxford University Press 2012).
- See also, DA Zetzsche, DW Arner, RP Buckley, and B Tang, Artificial Intelligence in Finance: Putting the Human in the Loop (Feb- ruary 2020). CFTE Academic Paper Series: Centre for Finance, Technology and Entrepreneurship, no. 1. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract= at p.17.
- Bharadwaj, op. cit. n 4. 38 Deloitte, The New Physics of Financial Services: How Artificial Intel- ligence Is Transforming The Financial Ecosystem, available in pdf at https://www2.deloitte.com/qa/en/pages/financial-services/ articles/artificial-intelligence-transforming-financial-ecosystem- deloitte-fsi.html (accessed 9 Sept 2019) (Companies like Comply Advantage, for example, use AI-based algorithms to monitor transactions).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yigitcanlar, T., & Cugurullo, F. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12208548 · Cited by 337
Hentzen, J. K., Hoffmann, A. O. I., Dolan, R. M., & Pala, E. (2021) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-09-2021-0417 · Cited by 327
AI Governance in a Complex and Rapidly Changing Regulatory Landscape: A Global Perspective
Zaidan, E., & Ibrahim, I. A. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03560-x · Cited by 275
Truby, J., Brown, R. D., Dahdal, A. M., & Ibrahim, I. A. (2022) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102499 · Cited by 181
Self-citationApplications, Challenges, and Future Directions of Human-in-the-Loop Learning
Kumar, S., Datta, S., Singh, V., Datta, D., Singh, S. K., & Sharma, R. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3401547 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- Truby, J., Brown, R., & Dahdal, A.
- Affiliations
- Qatar University (QA)
- Venue
- Law and Financial Markets Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-04-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 110-120
- ISSN
- 1752-1440 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-1459
- OpenAlex
- W3024628422
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 89.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Law and Financial Markets Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Qatar National Research Fund
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Keywords
- AI regulation, financial services, proactive regulation, financial stability, consumer protection, innovation and regulation, international regulatory cooperation, financial regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review