Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 47Urban Planning and GovernanceSustainability and Climate Change GovernanceInnovative Education and Learning Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unpacking social learning in planning: who learns what from whom?

Open access

Abstract

Social learning is the process of exchanging and developing knowledge (including skills and experiences) through human interaction. This key planning process needs to be better understood, given the increase and variety of non-planners influencing planning processes. This article explores who learns what from whom through social learning in planning. We unpack social learning theoretically to be able to map it, and employ empirically-based storytelling to discuss its relevance to planning practice. We conclude that social learning can lead to positive and negative outcomes and provides a useful analytical lens to understand planning practices at the level of individuals.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17535069.2019.1576216

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 84

  1. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.024 · DOI
  2. Allison G. T., 2014, The American Political Science Review, 95, 619
  3. 10.1068/c0648 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1978.tb01621.x · DOI
  5. Baum H. S., 1983, Planners and Public Expectations
  6. Baum H. S., 1987, The Invisible Bureaucracy: The Unconscious in Organizational Problem Solving
  7. 10.1080/14649357.2015.1071870 · DOI
  8. Beck S., 2016, Mittler, Macher, Protestierer
  9. Beebeejaun Y., 2016, The Participatory City
  10. 10.1177/0263774X16664905 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.envsci.2007.02.007 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/978-1-84996-133-2 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.envsci.2007.04.003 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.1100290108 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1177/0263774X16664518 · DOI
  16. Carrington P. J., 2011, The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis
  17. 10.5465/amr.1980.4288758 · DOI
  18. 10.1177/1473095215575919 · DOI
  19. 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.1022 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.009 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1177/0739456X8300300105 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/0739456X09333116 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x · DOI
  24. Dumitru A., 201, Social Learning in Social Innovation Initiatives: Learning about Systemic Relations and Strategies for Transformative Change
  25. EC, 2014, Social Innovation A Decade of Changes
  26. Ehlen C. G. J. M., 2015, Co-Creation of Innovation : Investment with and in Social Capital Education - Industry - Government
  27. 10.3828/tpr.2013.37 · DOI
  28. 10.1177/0739456X0202100401 · DOI
  29. Forester J., 1999, The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes
  30. Franke S., 2015, Het nieuwe stadmaken
  31. 10.1017/CBO9781139192675 · DOI
  32. 10.1068/a080927 · DOI
  33. Gelauff G., 2016, Leren van en voor nieuw beleid: Twee essays met perspectieven op leren en mobiliteitsbeleid
  34. Girard J. P., 2007, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 5, 161
  35. 10.3828/tpr.63.2.422x602303814821 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.tics.2015.12.007 · DOI
  37. 10.1177/1473095209105528 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.progress.2007.12.001 · DOI
  39. 10.1080/17535069.2014.885735 · DOI
  40. 10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2926-12.2012 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1037/pspa0000042 · DOI
  43. 10.1080/09640568.2014.973478 · DOI
  44. 10.4337/9781849809993 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/09640560801977190 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.progress.2015.06.002 · DOI
  47. 10.5751/ES-01542-110110 · DOI
  48. 10.1177/0952076707086255 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.003 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.5751/ES-03564-1504r01 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001 · DOI
  52. 10.1080/02697459.2016.1222120 · DOI
  53. Rosa M. L., 2011, Microplanning: Urban Creative Practices. São Paulo
  54. Rydin Y., 2010, Governing for Sustainable Urban Development
  55. 10.2307/j.ctt1t89bnc · DOI
  56. 10.1080/14649357.2016.1262982 · DOI
  57. 10.3102/0091732X023001001 · DOI
  58. Sánchez J. C., 2009, Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 41, 109
  59. 10.1080/1464935032000057209 · DOI
  60. 10.1177/1473095218770474 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.017 · DOI
  62. 10.1177/1473095214531430 · DOI
  63. Scharpf F. W., 1997, Games Real Actors Play. Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research
  64. 10.1007/s11213-013-9310-z · DOI
  65. Schön D., 1982, The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action
  66. SLIM, 2004, Social Learning : A New Policy Option for Integrated Management and Sustainable Use of Water - Based on Concerted Action
  67. Stone J., 2014, Understanding “Best-Practice” in Transit Planning: The Importance of Tacit Knowledge and Policy Learning
  68. 10.1080/00420980500279869 · DOI
  69. 10.1177/0739456X0202200104 · DOI
  70. Tewdwr-Jones M., 2002, Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory, 65
  71. 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 · DOI · Paper page
  72. UN-Habitat, 2010, UN-HABITAT Knowledge Strategy: Building Knowledge Based Organization
  73. UN-Habitat, 2016, Urbanization and Development: Emerging Futures. World Cities Report
  74. URBAN NEXUS, 2015, Engaging Society for a Sustainable City: URBAN NEXUS Research Findings
  75. van den Berg M., 2013, Stedelingen veranderen de stad: Over nieuwe collectieven, publiek domein en transitie
  76. Vanderhoven D., 2016, The Participatory City, 191
  77. 10.1037/gpr0000029 · DOI
  78. 10.1515/9781400846504 · DOI
  79. 10.1177/0263774X16646770 · DOI
  80. Wiekens C. J., 2012, Beïnvloeden en Veranderen van Gedrag
  81. 10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.963 · DOI
  82. 10.1111/1468-0491.00198 · DOI
  83. 10.1257/aer · DOI
  84. Zandbergen D., 2014, Etnofoor, 26, 7

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
von Schönfeld, K. C., Tan, W., Wiekens, C., & Janssen-Jansen, L.
Affiliations
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (NO)
  • Hanze University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Corresponding author
von Schönfeld, Kim Carlotta
Venue
Urban Research & Practice
Published
2019-02-12
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
411-433
ISSN
  • 1753-5069 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-5077
OpenAlex
W2914953497
Cited by
47
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4
FWCI
14.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Urban Research & Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (438-15-159)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
Keywords
social learning, urban planning, knowledge sharing, planning practice, storytelling, individual learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review