Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 292

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Advances on the Global Human Settlement Layer by joint assessment of Earth Observation and population survey data

Open access
Pesaresi, Martino, Schiavina, Marcello, Politis, Panagiotis, Freire, Sergio, Krasnodębska, Katarzyna, Uhl, Johannes H., Carioli, Alessandra, Corbane, Christina, Dijkstra, Lewis, Florio, Pietro, Friedrich, Hannah K., Gao, Jing, Leyk, Stefan, Lu, Linlin, Maffenini, Luca, Mari-Rivero, Ines, Melchiorri, Michele, Syrris, Vasileios, Van Den Hoek, Jamon, Kemper, Thomas·2024·International Journal of Digital Earth

Abstract

The Global Human Settlement Layer (GHSL) project fosters an enhanced, public understanding of the human presence on Earth. A decade after its inception in the Digital Earth 2020 vision, GHSL is an established project of the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre and an integral part of the Copernicus Emergency Management Service. The 2023 GHSL edition, a result of rigorous research on Earth Observation data and population censuses, contributes significantly to understanding worldwide human settlements. It introduces new elements like 10-m-resolution, sub-pixel estimation of built-up surfaces, global building height and volume estimates, and a classification of residential and non-residential areas, improving population density grids. This paper evaluates GHSL’s key components, including the Symbolic Machine Learning approach, using novel reference data. These data enable a comparative assessment of GHSL model predictions on the evolution of built-up surface, building heights, and resident population. Empirical evidence suggests that GHSL estimates are the most accurate in the public domain today (e.g. IoU 0.98 water class, 0.92 built-up class, 0.8 non-residential class, 6% MAE for the 100 m built-up surface or 2.27 m MAE for the building height, 83% TAA for resident population). The paper consolidates GHSL’s theoretical foundation and highlights its innovative features for transparent Artificial Intelligence, facilitating international decision-making processes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17538947.2024.2390454

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 72 references

Metadata

Authors
Pesaresi, M., Schiavina, M., Politis, P., Freire, S., Krasnodębska, K., Uhl, J. H., Carioli, A., Corbane, C., Dijkstra, L., Florio, P., Friedrich, H. K., Gao, J., Leyk, S., Lu, L., Maffenini, L., Mari-Rivero, I., Melchiorri, M., Syrris, V., Van Den Hoek, J., & Kemper, T.
Venue
International Journal of Digital Earth
Published
2024-08-30
Volume
17
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1753-8947 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-8955
OpenAlex
W4402066757
Cited by
292
References
72
FWCI
52.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advances on the Global Human Settlement Layer by joint assessment of Earth Observation and population survey data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17538947.2024.2390454
The paper
Pesaresi, M., Schiavina, M., Politis, P., Freire, S., Krasnodębska, K., Uhl, J. H., Carioli, A., Corbane, C., Dijkstra, L., Florio, P., Friedrich, H. K., Gao, J., Leyk, S., Lu, L., Maffenini, L., Mari-Rivero, I., Melchiorri, M., Syrris, V., Van Den Hoek, J., & Kemper, T. (2024). Advances on the Global Human Settlement Layer by joint assessment of Earth Observation and population survey data. International Journal of Digital Earth. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2024.2390454

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.