Syrian farmers in the midst of drought and conflict: the causes, patterns, and aftermath of land abandonment and migration
Open accessAbstract
The prevailing narrative on the Syrian Civil War attributes it to climate-induced migration resulting from a severe drought, which serves as a central link connecting climate change with the 2011 protests. However, limited research has involved interviews with Syrians, with most studies focusing on drought's meteorological aspects and estimated migrant numbers. Our interdisciplinary study we conduct surveys with 82 former Syrian farmers in Turkey, carry out 16 in-depth interviews, and analyse satellite images to explore land use activities. Our objective is to answer three questions: (1) How can we distinguish between 'forced displacement' and 'migration as an adaptive response' during the 2007–2009 drought in Syria and the subsequent civil war? (2) How do drought, land abandonment, and migration interact in Syria since 2006? (3) How can we enhance understanding of 'trapped' individuals, considering mobility restrictions in host countries rather than solely immobility in the country of origin? Our findings are threefold: firstly, Syrian farmers employed adaptive measures against drought before the war; secondly, land abandonment during the drought was less extensive than portrayed in literature linking climate, migration, and conflict; and finally, we emphasize that refugees may feel trapped even after leaving their homes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Scholars now mostly agree that climate-related disasters increase violent conflict risks, but only under certain circumstances.
“Scholars now mostly agree that climate-related disasters increase violent conflict risks, but only under certain circumstances.”
From The impacts of climate change on violent conflict risk: a review of causal pathways (2024) · cites this paper as Dinc and Eklund 2024
Recent evidence suggests unusually low rainfall was at least one conflict driver, interacting with others, in Syria and Western Africa.
“Recent evidence suggests, however, that unusually low rainfall was at least one conflict driver (interacting with others, presumably more important) both in Syria (Ash and Obradovich 2020, Dinc and Eklund 2023) and Western Africa (Newman et al 2023).”
From The impacts of climate change on violent conflict risk: a review of causal pathways (2024) · cites this paper as Dinc and Eklund 2023
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 36
- Authors
- Dinc, P., & Eklund, L.
- Affiliations
- Department of Political Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Lund University (SE)
- Venue
- Climate and Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-07
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 349-362
- ISSN
- 1756-5529 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-5537
- OpenAlex
- W4382810392
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 15.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Climate and Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- MECW
- Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Transboundary Water Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
- Keywords
- Syrian civil war, drought, climate-induced migration, land abandonment, forced displacement, adaptive migration, refugees, mobility restrictions, climate and conflict, Turkey
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review