Cited by 28Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisSoil erosion and sediment transport

Higher carbon sequestration on Swedish dairy farms compared with other farm types as revealed by national soil inventories

Open access
Henryson, Kajsa, Meurer, Katharina H. E., Bolinder, Martin A., Kätterer, Thomas, Tidåker, Pernilla·2022·Carbon Management

Abstract

Small changes in the large stock of soil organic carbon (SOC) can have a substantial influence on the climate impact of agriculture. We used information from a Swedish soil monitoring program, in combination with farm census data, to analyze decadal SOC concentrations and SOC stock changes on dairy farms compared with other farm types, and to quantify the climate impact of these changes on dairy farms. Soil monitoring data included topsoil samples from two inventories on 159 dairy farms, 86 beef farms, 318 arable farms, and 13 pig farms, taken at the same locations in 2001–2007 and 2011–2017. Concentrations of SOC on dairy farms (3.0%) were significantly higher than on arable farms (2.3%) and pig farms (2.4%), but not significantly different from beef farms (3.1%). SOC concentration was correlated with proportion of ley at farm scale. SOC stocks in the upper 20 cm increased significantly on dairy, beef, and arable farms, by 0.38, 0.14, and 0.21 Mg C ha−1 year−1, respectively, between 2001–2007 and 2011–2017. For dairy farms, this corresponded to −1.4 Mg CO2 ha−1 and approximately −0.22 kg CO2 kg−1 energy-corrected milk, demonstrating that SOC changes could have a substantial influence on the climate footprint of milk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17583004.2022.2074315

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A SOC increase of 50 t ha−1 seems rather challenging and might be rarely reached.

    “It is worth emphasizing that, compared with the findings from other studies which investigated soil C-sequestration potential34,35, a SOC increase of 50 t ha−1 seems to be rather challenging and might be rarely reached.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henryson, K., Meurer, K. H. E., Bolinder, M. A., Kätterer, T., & Tidåker, P.
Affiliations
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Corresponding author
Tidåker, Pernilla
Venue
Carbon Management
Published
2022-01-02
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
266-278
ISSN
  • 1758-3004 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-3012
OpenAlex
W4280582967
Cited by
28
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Carbon Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Epsilon Open Archive (Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet biblioteket (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences)) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
soil organic carbon, carbon sequestration, dairy farms, leys, topsoil, arable farms, pig farms, beef cattle farms, milk production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review