Cited by 158Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact

Use of 3-nitrooxypropanol as feed additive for mitigating enteric methane emissions from ruminants: a meta-analysis

Open access
Jayanegara, Anuraga, Sarwono, Ki Ageng, Kondo, Makoto, Matsui, Hiroki, Ridla, Muhammad, Laconi, Erika B., Nahrowi·2018·Italian Journal of Animal Science

Abstract

This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis on the effect of 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP) on enteric methane (CH4) emissions from ruminants. A total of 12 in vivo studies from 10 articles were integrated into a database. Ruminant species included were dairy cows, beef cattle and sheep. Concentration of 3-NOP in diets varied from 0 to 280 mg/kg dry matter intake (DMI). Parameters included were CH4 emissions, rumen fermentation, microbial population, nutrient digestibility and animal performance. Meta-analysis of data was performed by using mixed model methodology in which different studies were treated as random effects whereas 3-NOP addition levels in diets of ruminants were treated as fixed effects. Results showed that increasing level of 3-NOP addition in diets of ruminants decreased enteric CH4 emissions per unit of body weight, CH4/DMI, CH4/milk produced, CH4/digested organic matter or CH4/gross energy intake (p < .05). Production of H2 was higher with increasing level of 3-NOP addition (p < .001). Addition of 3-NOP decreased total VFA concentration (p < .01), and decreased and increased proportions of C2 and C3, respectively (p < .001). Addition of 3-NOP decreased archaea population (p < .01) but it did not change total bacteria and protozoa populations. The substance had minor effect on digestibility of nutrients. Production performance of dairy cows and beef cattle was limitedly influenced by the addition of 3-NOP in the diets, and it had no negative effect on DMI of ruminants. It is concluded that 3-NOP is an effective feed additive to mitigate enteric CH4 emissions without compromising productive performance of ruminants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1828051x.2017.1404945

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 158

Authors
Jayanegara, A., Sarwono, K. A., Kondo, M., Matsui, H., Ridla, M., Laconi, E. B., & Nahrowi
Affiliations
  • IPB University (ID)
  • Mie University (JP)
Corresponding author
Jayanegara, Anuraga
Venue
Italian Journal of Animal Science
Published
2017-11-23
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
650-656
ISSN
  • 1594-4077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1828-051X
OpenAlex
W2768916485
Cited by
158
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Italian Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Keywords
3-nitrooxypropanol, enteric methane mitigation, ruminants, feed additives, dairy cattle, beef cattle, sheep, rumen fermentation, volatile fatty acids, hydrogen production, nutrient digestibility, animal performance, methane emissions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review