Cited by 82Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsInnovative Human-Technology InteractionPhysical Activity and Health

Wearing, Thinking, and Moving: Testing the Feasibility of Fitness Tracking with Urban Youth

Schaefer, Sara E., Ching, Cynthia Carter, Breen, Heather, German, J. Bruce·2016·American Journal of Health Education

Abstract

Background: Wearable and mobile technologies are often used by people who wish to document their own health and lifestyle behaviors. The feasibility of health tracking among youth is unclear, particularly in low-resource communities where health strategies stand to have the greatest impact. Methods: Youth (n = 24) enrolled in an afterschool program in an urban school district were provided Fitbit physical activity monitors. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected over 6 months; logged data from Fitbit.com were examined to assess physical activity patterns and level engagement with the technology and focus groups were conducted to assess motivators and barriers to use. Results: Data logs revealed low continuous engagement that declined over time. Qualitative findings suggest that, when youth wore their devices, they noticed and engaged with their real-time device data in reflective ways. Some aspects of the device's form factor were problematic for these youth, and technology access, environmental constraints, and motivation were also barriers to continuous engagement. Translation to Health Education Practice: Taken together, these mixed methods findings suggest that effecting sustainable changes in youth behavior through health tracking alone is challenging. Adequate training, programmatic/staff support, technology access, and motivation may help sustain ongoing use and engagement. We recommend that health tracking in similar contexts be situated within educational curricula and/or a broader intervention that facilitates and motivates continuous engagement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19325037.2015.1111174

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 31 · Cited by 82

Authors
Schaefer, S. E., Ching, C. C., Breen, H., & German, J. B.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Schaefer, Sara E.
Venue
American Journal of Health Education
Published
2016-01-02
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
8-16
ISSN
  • 1932-5037 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-3751
OpenAlex
W2231777852
Cited by
82
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
20.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Health Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
fitness tracking, wearable devices, Fitbit, children's physical activity, urban youth, underserved areas, technology engagement, barriers to use, motivation, after-school programs, health behavior change, health education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review