The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Angry Black Woman: The Impact of Pejorative Stereotypes on Psychotherapy with Black Women
Abstract
In the aftermath of slavery and the resulting social, economic, and political effects, Black women have become the victims of negative stereotyping in mainstream American culture. Such stereotypes include the myth of the angry Black woman that characterizes these women as aggressive, ill tempered, illogical, overbearing, hostile, and ignorant without provocation. Symptoms presented by Black women during mental health treatment may reinforce this myth. However, many of the negative characteristics of the angry Black woman developed in response to external stressors and historical factors. Black women also have a unique experience with and expressions of anger that shape the presenting symptoms interpreted by the mental health clinician. This myth and corresponding negative stereotypes significantly affect Black women intrapsychically, interpersonally, and are likely to influence the efficacy of mental health treatment. Understanding and treatment of Black women in a mental health context should be influenced by the cultural norms and sociopolitical dynamics affecting these clients. Successful mental health treatment requires cultural competence and clinicians who are well prepared to navigate the inherent complexities of culture with clients. Awareness of the angry Black woman mythology, including its genesis, manifestations, and the unique experiences of Black women, may raise the standards of cultural competence for clinicians and provide more successful treatment outcomes in working with this population. A case example illustrates the assiduity essential to practicing in a culturally competent manner. A client is presented from a traditional psychotherapeutic perspective and then viewed through a lens that integrates psychotherapeutic practice with conscious awareness of the mythology and stereotypes impacting Black women. Implications for culturally relevant practice are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward the Development of the Stereotypic Roles for Black Women Scale
Thomas, A. J., Witherspoon, K. M., & Speight, S. L. (2004) · Journal of Black Psychology · doi:10.1177/0095798404266061 · Cited by 221
Cited by
Knighton, J.-S., Dogan, J., Hargons, C., & Stevens-Watkins, D. (2022) · Ethnicity & Health · doi:10.1080/13557858.2020.1818695 · Cited by 38
“women’s increased exposure to racism in predominantlyWhite spacesmay increase psychological distress (Ashley 2014; Walton and Boone 2019).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Ashley, W.
- Venue
- Social Work in Public Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-11-04
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-34
- ISSN
- 1937-190X (ISSN-L)
- 1937-1918
- OpenAlex
- W1976837593
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Angry Black Woman: The Impact of Pejorative Stereotypes on Psychotherapy with Black Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/19371918.2011.619449
- The paper
- Ashley, W. (2014). The Angry Black Woman: The Impact of Pejorative Stereotypes on Psychotherapy with Black Women. Social Work in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2011.619449
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.